Sound like perhaps Mr. Corbett, and/or one of Mr. Corbett's political associates/donors may have been one of those people that have been rumored to have traded favors with Mr. Sandusky in exchange for access to little boys. That might explain why Mr. Corbett has been dragging his heels on the prosecution of Mr. Sandusky, insofar as it might expose a few uncomfortable details about 'somebody's' private life. If there were no extenuating circumstances, why not prosecute a know child molester? It doesn't make sense until you consider that Corbett might be a personal stake in all of this.
Sound like perhaps Mr. Corbett, and/or one of Mr. Corbett's political associates/donors may have been one of those people that have been rumored to have traded favors with Mr. Sandusky in exchange for access to little boys. That might explain why Mr. Corbett has been dragging his heels on the prosecution of Mr. Sandusky, insofar as it might expose a few uncomfortable details about 'somebody's' private life. If there were no extenuating circumstances, why not prosecute a know child molester? It doesn't make sense until you consider that Corbett might be a personal stake in all of this.