It's literally Capitalism

Posted May 10, 2023, 11:25 AM UTC

Posted May 10, 2023, 11:25 AM UTC
Your house under capitalism: ... Relax, just joking. You don't have any. Renting and shut up, or if you lucky enough this doghouse will be yours. Of course if you survive 50 years of mortgage.
Yeah, I was just going to say that it’s like this in Capitalism now, but you have to pay 60% of your income to a vampire to live in that ugly apartment.
Renting is so horrible as of late, it's unbelievable the victim complex landlords have gained since COVID, despite the US Government offering to pay them in full for services unpaid due to the outbreak. Now most landlords demand you pay a 30 to 60 dollar application PRIOR to even seeing the place. If you get approved you sometimes have to pay another 30 dollar administrative fee (whatever the fuck that is). Then, if all is well, you have to pay first and last months rent, which is standard, but some are demanding a second months rent on top of it. Oh, and then there's the request of not one but TWO security deposits, which sorry but fuck that. I've never me a person whose gotten their deposit back except for a sibling who had to go to court over it. This doesn't even cover inflation.
Admin fee is typically to pay people who record payments and tenant standing, track open units, and general bookkeeping tasks; all the bureaucratic things the actual owners are too busy rolling naked in a pile of money to do.
They can kiss my admin ace
According to Census Bureau data, over 38 percent of owner-occupied housing units are owned free and clear. For homeowners under age 65, the share of paid-off homes is 26.4 percent.
Not supporting this stupid Tweet, but the picture you paint isn’t accurate either. Capitalism in America is leading to inequality where there are a lot of people doing just fine, and a lot of people struggling with not much in between with a large gap that is hard to cross (in either direction, regardless of your intelligence or work ethic).
So, do you telling me that situation when three quarter of people under age 65 don't own their houses in the wealthiest nation on the earth is fine? Ok then, probably it's statement too American to me to understand
No, I’m not telling you that. Reread what I was telling you.
My point only being that you made it sound as if almost no one owns their home here, and that is just factually wrong. Many people do own outright and have no mortgage. Many do not and never will.
Also, the number of “effective” home owners in America under age 65 is greater than 75%. Many people can pay off their mortgage or their net assets/worth is greater than their outstanding mortgage, but there is no reason for them to pay it off. I have a 2.75% APY fixed rate locked in mortgage, and I can get over 5% on T-bills, and much higher than 2.75% in money market funds. There’s no reason for me to pay if off quicker—I would lose money by doing so.
Also, If you live in a $600,000 home and have $400,000 equity in it, you are arguably in far better shape in the U.S. than owning a 1 room $2,000 home with an outhouse and having it paid off in many countries. You can’t gauge a country’s problems by % of population who own a home outright only!
But there are major problems in the U.S., and a lack of affordable housing is indeed one of them.
I shouldn't feed the troll, but this is the dumbest statistic. You're only talking about owner occupied housing units. How many houses are owned by corporations to rent? How many people under 65 will never be able to buy a house?
Lol...they post in r/bitcoin...
Socialism is when... box houses?
Apparently yeah.. I even think you're assasinated if you're trying to make your house better..
The apartment blocks they made were pretty small tbf
If it's really capitalism, why did he call it socialism?
Check mate liberal.
Damnit... You got me..
No, thats not capitalism. In capitalism those are both upperclass houses. The second one is where they live while the first is the one they use to extort money from you every month.
That is true indeed.. Didnt think of that.
[deleted]
For some reasons they never seem to connect the dots...
Pretty sure the fancy house is the Chartwell Mansion in Bel-Air California. Apparently it was the house the Beverly Hillbillies moved into once Jethro pulled himself up by his bootstraps and became an oil tycoon - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chartwell_Mansion
The Chartwell Mansion is a Chateauesque mansion in Bel-Air, California. Built in 1933, it is best known for its role as the Clampett family home in the 1960s television sitcom The Beverly Hillbillies. It was the most expensive home for sale in the United States in 2018.
^([ )^(F.A.Q)^( | )^(Opt Out)^( | )^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)^( | )^(GitHub)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5)
Your house under capitalism: you don't have a house
Lol but for the American who posted this socialism probably mean Joe Biden or Barack Obama so might be accurate!
At least I can have a house under socialism lmfao
Me when I see a Yakubian house that's bigger than a social center: "Who did you murder to steal the wealth from?"
So they admit to representative government under socialism. It's baby steps folks!
Can confirm. I live in Maxine Waters district....but she doesn't! lol.
laughs in nazi poloci
☭☭☭ COME SHITPOST WITH US ON DISCORD, COMRADES ☭☭☭
This is a heavily-moderated socialist community based on a podcast of the same name. If you are new to the sub, please read the sidebar carefully.
If you are new to Marxism-Leninism, check out Marxism Today's Socialism 101 series.
Are there Liberals in the walls? Try the following prompts to trigger an automod response: "What is Fascism?", "What is Imperialism?", "What is Revisionism?" "Holodomor", "Molotov-Ribbentrop", "Uyghur", "Tiananmen Square", "Freedom of the Press", "MAC Fact"
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
[deleted]
#The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact
Anti-Communists and horseshoe-theorists love to tell anyone who will listen that the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact (1939) was a military alliance between the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany. They frame it as a cynical and opportunistic agreement between two totalitarian powers that paved the way for the outbreak of World War II in order to equate Communism with Fascism. They are, of course, missing key context.
German Background
The loss of World War I and the Treaty of Versailles had a profound effect on the German economy. Signed in 1919, the treaty imposed harsh reparations on the newly formed Weimar Republic (1919-1933), forcing the country to pay billions of dollars in damages to the Allied powers. The Treaty of Versailles, which ended the war, required Germany to cede all of its colonial possessions to the Allied powers. This included territories in Africa, Asia, and the Pacific, including German East Africa, German Southwest Africa, Togoland, Cameroon, and German New Guinea.
With an understanding of Historical Materialism and the role that Imperialism plays in maintaining a liberal democracy, it is clear that the National Bourgeoisie would embrace Fascism under these conditions. (Ask: "What is Imperialism?" and "What is Fascism?" for details)
Judeo-Bolshevism (a conspiracy theory which claimed that Jews were responsible for the Russian Revolution of 1917, and that they have used Communism as a cover to further their own interests) gained significant traction in Nazi Germany, where it became a central part of Nazi propaganda and ideology. Adolf Hitler and other leading members of the Nazi Party frequently used the term to vilify Jews and justify their persecution.
The Communist Party of Germany (KPD) was repressed by the Nazi regime soon after they came to power in 1933. In the weeks following the Reichstag Fire, the Nazis arrested and imprisoned thousands of Communists and other political dissidents. This played a significant role in the passage of the Enabling Act of 1933, which granted Hitler and the Nazi Party dictatorial powers and effectively dismantled the Weimar Republic.
Soviet Background
Following the Russian Revolution in 1917, Great Britain and other Western powers placed strict trade restrictions on the Soviet Union. These restrictions were aimed at isolating the Soviet Union and weakening its economy in an attempt to force the new Communist government to collapse.
In the 1920s, the Soviet Union under Lenin's leadership was sympathetic towards Germany because the two countries shared a common enemy in the form of the Western capitalist powers, particularly France and Great Britain. The Soviet Union and Germany established diplomatic relations and engaged in economic cooperation with each other. The Soviet Union provided technical and economic assistance to Germany and in return, it received access to German industrial and technological expertise, as well as trade opportunities.
However, this cooperation was short-lived, and by the late 1920s, relations between the two countries had deteriorated. The Soviet Union's efforts to export its socialist ideology to Germany were met with resistance from the German government and the rising Nazi Party, which viewed Communism as a threat to its own ideology and ambitions.
Collective Security (1933-1939)
The appointment of Hitler as Germany's chancellor general, as well as the rising threat from Japan, led to important changes in Soviet foreign policy. Oriented toward Germany since the treaty of Locarno (1925) and the treaty of Special Relations with Berlin (1926), the Kremlin now moved in the opposite direction by trying to establish closer ties with France and Britain to isolate the growing Nazi threat. This policy became known as "collective security" and was associated with Maxim Litvinov, the Soviet foreign minister at the time. The pursuit of collective security lasted approximately as long as he held that position. Japan's war with China took some pressure off of Russia by allowing it to focus its diplomatic efforts on relations with Europe.
- Andrei P. Tsygankov, (2012). Russia and the West from Alexander to Putin.
However, the memories of the Russian Revolution and the fear of Communism were still fresh in the minds of many Western leaders, and there was a reluctance to enter into an alliance with the Soviet Union. They believed that Hitler was a bulwark against Communism and that a strong Germany could act as a buffer against Soviet expansion.
Instead of joining the USSR in a collective security alliance against Nazi Germany, the Western leaders decided to try appeasing Nazi Germany. As part of the policy of appeasement, several territories were ceded to Nazi Germany in the late 1930s:
However, instead of appeasing Nazi Germany by giving in to their territorial demands, these concessions only emboldened them and ultimately led to the outbreak of World War II.
The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact
Papers which were kept secret for almost 70 years show that the Soviet Union proposed sending a powerful military force in an effort to entice Britain and France into an anti-Nazi alliance.
Such an agreement could have changed the course of 20th century history...
The offer of a military force to help contain Hitler was made by a senior Soviet military delegation at a Kremlin meeting with senior British and French officers, two weeks before war broke out in 1939.
The new documents... show the vast numbers of infantry, artillery and airborne forces which Stalin's generals said could be dispatched, if Polish objections to the Red Army crossing its territory could first be overcome.
But the British and French side - briefed by their governments to talk, but not authorised to commit to binding deals - did not respond to the Soviet offer...
- Nick Holdsworth. (2008). Stalin 'planned to send a million troops to stop Hitler if Britain and France agreed pact'
After trying and failing to get the Western capitalist powers to join the Soviet Union in a collective security alliance against Nazi Germany, and witnessing country after country being ceded, it became clear to Soviet leadership that war was inevitable-- and Poland was next.
Unfortunately, there was a widespread belief in Poland that Jews were overrepresented in the Soviet government and that the Soviet Union was being controlled by Jewish Communists. This conspiracy theory (Judeo-Bolshevism) was fueled by anti-Semitic propaganda that was prevalent in Poland at the time. The Polish government was strongly anti-Communist and had been actively involved in suppressing Communist movements in Poland and other parts of Europe. Furthermore, the Polish government believed that it could rely on the support of Britain and France in the event of a conflict with Nazi Germany. The Polish government had signed a mutual defense pact with Britain in March 1939, and believed that this would deter Germany from attacking Poland.
Seeing the writing on the wall, the Soviet Union made the difficult decision to do what it felt it needed to do to survive the coming conflict. At the time of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact's signing (August 1939), the Soviet Union was facing significant military pressure from the West, particularly from Britain and France, which were seeking to isolate the Soviet Union and undermine its influence in Europe. The Soviet Union saw the Pact as a way to counterbalance this pressure and to gain more time to build up its military strength and prepare for the inevitable conflict with Nazi Germany, which began less than two years later in June 1941 (Operation Barbarossa).
Additional Resources
Video Essays:
Books, Articles, or Essays:
*I am a bot, and this action was
Good bot
Thank you, kayodeade99, for voting on AutoModerator.
This bot wants to find the best and worst bots on Reddit. You can view results here.
^(Even if I don't reply to your comment, I'm still listening for votes. Check the webpage to see if your vote registered!)
[deleted]
[deleted]
Capitalism according to capitalists: Capitalism in their fantasies
Socialism according to capitalists: Capitalism in reality
I know many anti-Communists who are really communists but don't even realise it because they have been gaslighted. This is true for some conservative religious people I know.
They think socialism is opposed to meritocracy. If you explain that capitalism is anti-meritocracy and socialism enables authentic meritocracy, you might win them over.
Didn’t Soviet top officials live in apartment blocks next to where they worked?
Socialism is when capitalism, a classic.
Around and around, this shit never ends with these people.
I really need to get off reddit...
I'm sorry. Just saw it on Twitter and wanted to share. I'm sort of new in here but probably should have thought this kind of stuff gets posted in here all the time.
Talking about libs. Not your post.
I think I misunderstood this part. My bad.
[deleted]
It's fine
But if you like this sort of thing check out the SocialismIsCapitalism subreddit, it's full of these things
Kind of hilarious that when I open the SocialismIsCapitalism subreddit the same meme is the first post I see.
Maybe that OP follows the same Twitters you do ;)
I think you misread what they typed!