[deleted]•

[deleted]

30
jessaholic•

Agreed, this is nonsense and embarrassingly "special snowflake".

2†
tygertygerFeminist•

I don't like giving people like that pageviews, so I've copied the text below. Also, if you're wondering about the random downvotes in this thread, it's probably because this was also posted to r/mensrights with a title about how r/feminism doesn't get it. Anyway, here it is. Sorry about any formatting issues:

Anonymous Letter

Two notes about this post:

  1. I don't presume to speak for my son, but he's no dummy.

  2. This was supposed to be short enough to print several copies, so I could "drop" a few in strategic locations around a nearby college campus. But you know me! Some days I just can't shut up. My husband thanks you in advance for your sympathy.


A letter to a future daughter-in-law, possibly my own:

A few years from now, you’re probably going to want to marry my son. Perhaps you already do; he’s kind of hot and his potential is quite obvious, if I do say so myself. He’s only 20, handsome and well-built, and when he lets his hair grow long, it’s thick and wavy. He has his father’s beautiful eyes, and my dimples look much better on him than they ever did on me. He’s also a U.S. Marine; he has finished his deployment and doesn’t expect to go overseas again, so he’s preparing to begin earning college credits. I don’t hover, so I’m not sure which major he’s chosen – engineering or actuarial science. He surfs, rides a motorcycle and a mountain bike, hikes, and maintains a classic car. Pretty much everybody likes him or loves him, and respects him. Girls hit on him regularly.

I’ll be surprised if he ever marries though. You see, his plan is to wait until he’s at least thirty, therefore he will spend the next decade meeting, dating, working with, and probably sleeping with, the product of 60 years of American feminism. I’m pretty sure he won’t find many women worth considering for marriage. How about we look at it from his perspective, m’kay? Here’s what he sees:

Half of you have been raised without your fathers, yet only a few of your fathers deserved to be kicked out of your lives; you were raised by the women who kicked your fathers out, and perhaps a string of stepdads and “uncles.” And those women, your mothers, taught you their values by example. Not an auspicious start. Most of the rest of you were raised by fathers who knew damn well that if they displeased your mothers, they too could be kicked out of your lives according to your mothers’ whims. They knew full well who had the REAL power in the family; they quietly accepted that “mother knows best.”

You were raised in a culture that permits, even encourages, women and girls to always push for more. Not necessarily to do more or earn more, but to demand more and to expect more. You were punished far less severely for your transgressions than were your male peers. Indeed your female peers egged you on to be even naughtier, and to be defiant about it. It’s Grrrl Power, after all! The boys of your acquaintance were expected to give in to your shenanigans and your shit tests, and those who didn’t were labeled “problem children” and medicated. A boy’s best bet was to shut up and grovel, and maybe win your approval. They sure weren’t allowed to go around offending the Special Snowflakes now, were they?

You were raised in a Disney Princess Culture, where every girl is entitled to her Prince Charming. And if she can’t find one, she has the Grrrl Power to kiss any old frog and transform him into a Prince. You were raised to be a slut, at least through your twenties. Go to College. Establish a Career. Don’t get married until your late twenties or early thirties, but DO NOT, under any circumstances, repress your sexuality. Your foremothers fought hard for your right to be promiscuous with no consequences; don’t you dare let their efforts go to waste. And since you’re not looking for a husband, there’s no need to sleep with only “good” men, is there? ‘Cuz badboyz are hawt! And nice guys are boring. Additionally, you have plenty of time to ride the best cocks you can find; thanks to modern medicine, you can get pregnant after menopause if you want, so there’s no hurry. You are expected to waste your youth and your beauty on hot guys who treat you like shit, then give your leftovers to the guy you’ll promise to love, honor and cherish for the rest of your life. Wow, how lucky is he!

My son looks around and he sees bitchy, arrogant, malicious women. He sees spoiled greedy women. He sees financially irresponsible women. He sees lazy undisciplined women. (Yes, even in the military; they had to lower the standards so more women could “serve.”) He sees overweight women wearing unflattering clothes that display muffin tops and rolls of fat, who drool over his biceps while telling him that “looks aren’t important.” He sees slutty women who dress to attract men, sleep with the “hot” ones, and denigrate the rest by calling them “creepy.” He sees “competitive” professional women, whose primary tool for getting ahead is the threat of sexual harassment lawsuits. He sees demanding women who expect men to bow and scrape for the privilege of a smile. He sees utterly irrational women whose “self-esteem ” is obscenely disproportionate to their proven worth. He sees women who expect romantic dates and expensive gifts, yet have absolutely nothing of value to contribute to a relationship. He sees women who flirt with their hopeful, geeky JustFriends, barely enough to keep them on a string while simultaneously panting after Alpha Hotties, then run crying back to those JustFriends after being pumped and dumped by said Hotties, “Oh, why can’t more men be nice like you?” (Answer: if they were, no woman would fuck them.) Look around you ladies. You see the very same women, don’t you? Most of you are these women. You think this is normal and acceptable, because “everybody does it.” It’s not. There’s something you should know about my son and his peers. They’re not gay, they’re not lazy, they’re not stupid, they’re not unambitious, and they’re not weak. They’ve merely figured you out. They know you don’t give a rat’s ass about them, and you see them as nothing but providers and fantasy sex objects. They are wise to the game and they’re done playing by your rules.

They have the same job titles as you and they take home the same pay, but they work longer hours and they do harder work; they know that their productivity is why employers can afford to hire you to sit at a desk and shuffle papers. They know that if two drunken people have sex and both regret it in the morning, only one of them is a “rapist.” They know that “My Body/My Choice” actually means"My Body/My Choice/Your Wallet." They know that the minute they sign a marriage license, everything they own is yours, but nothing you own is theirs (except your debts) and you can walk away with cash and prizes, at any time, for any reason. Or for no reason at all.

They’re calling Bullshit.

A few years from now, you’ll begin asking yourself, “Where have all the good men gone?” You’ll look down your noses at all those guys playing video games and living like frat boys in cheap apartments, and you’ll know that they could do “so much better” for themselves. You’ll shake your heads in wonder at their “immaturity,” or their “wasted potential.” Here’s a little secret. (Yep. A few men are immature and weak – they’ve had the masculinity abused or medicated out of them by their single mothers and grandmothers) but most of them?

They no longer give a rat’s ass about YOU.

That’s right. They don’t need to work hard and earn a good living. They have no intention of fathering and supporting any children, and no desire whatsoever earn your approval. You go buy your own four bedroom colonial in just the right subdivision! That’s what Grrrl Power is for, isn’t it? Many of these men will go so far as to quit their jobs as soon as they begin to “earn a good living.” They don’t want to earn enough money to pay taxes. They don’t want to pay the salaries of millions of useless (and mostly female) government employees, and they don’t want to pay for the personal choices of “Empowered Women.” They refuse to feed your Beast. And you, and your church, and your government can’t cajole them or shame them into giving a shit. Men are dropping out, Ladies. Chivalry has died of blunt force trauma, in a beatdown administered by Grrrl Power. Your mothers, your grandmothers, your schools, your family courts, your sociology professors, have all spent the last two generations telling men that they are unnecessary and unwelcome. And now they’re leaving. (Oh sure, they’ll be glad to fuck you while you’re young and hot, aaaand then they’ll move on to younger and hotter sluts.)

This is the gift that feminism has given to you – Independence. Scary, lonely, bitter, potentially impoverished Independence. For yourselves and for any children you may have. Most of you won’t blame feminism though; you’ll blame Male Privilege (which doesn’t exist.) You’ll blame The Patriarchy (which always gave women a far better deal than it gave men.) You will stamp your feet, flip your hair, and blame anything except the single cultural force that has devoted itself to suppressing and controlling masculinity. And you’ll go home alone every night to your cats, your Facebook Friends, and your vibrator. I sure hope that’s what you want.

                                                                                               Sincerely,
                                                                                               A Mom
23
[deleted]•

tl;dr: No woman in the world is good enough for my son, who I've raised to conform to what my sexist mind considers to be the perfect man so I can keep him all to myself!

Seriously, I feel really bad for whoever ends up this bitch's daughter-in-law.

11
demmianTransnational Feminism•

I don't like giving people like that pageviews, so I've copied the text below.

This is a good point; the sidebar and the FAQ have been updated: "Screenshots or text-copies should be used instead of linking directly to objectionable materials.".

7
tygertygerFeminist•

Thank you- that seems like a good rule to have.

4
theaccountingchef•

This doesn't deserve a screen shot.

2
tygertygerFeminist•

I agree. In fact it shouldn't have been posted in the first place. Most of the comments should have been deleted long ago and several users should have been banned (the author of the post was in here harassing a victim of sexual assault and was still posting after those comments were removed; i.e., the mods saw it but didn't ban her for it).

Sexism, classism, heterosexism, homophobia, anti-egalitarianism, transphobia, ableism, racism, and any other oppressive belief systems are not allowed.

Discussions in this subreddit will assume the validity of feminism's existence, its egalitarian aspect, and the necessity of feminism's continued existence.

I report what I can but the mods choose to ignore it and their own rules. I don't understand the mods' rationale for tolerating MRA invasions and obvious rule violations while banning (or threatening to ban) feminists and enforcing rules not in the sidebar.

4
[deleted]•

[deleted]

-1
tygertygerFeminist•

I skimmed them. Just some reiterations of the blog post with some bio-truthy goodness thrown in for flavor. Nothing particularly interesting.

7
melann•

if you rely on comments to deliver the education, you're probably not a very good writer.

7
justabutterfly•

I doubt she even finished school. She probably thinks women getting a complete education is a waste of time, seeing as all we're good for is manipulating men to get a ring on our finger and popping out some kids. We can't blame her for being a bad writer, in that case. She's too busy pumping up her 'hot' son's ego and turning him into a man that I wouldn't want to have anything to do with anyway. He'll compare every girl with his mother...and that's how she wants it.

11
[deleted]•

So you are a feminist. Interesting ...

You haven't addressed any of her criticism. All you're doing is attacking the woman for having an opinion different from yours. Bravo.

Feminism! /s

-10
[deleted]•

[deleted]

15
TheNakedAnt•

Crazy fuckers.

What does, "Red Pill wisdom" mean?

It popped up in the comments a couple times.

13
tygertygerFeminist•

The Matrix reference that MRAs seem to really like. PUAs use it too.

In the movie, Neo takes the red pill and is awakened to what society really is. According to MRAs, feminists think we've taken the red pill but really it was the blue pill! We're in denial! Only MRAs have taken the red pill! Only they understand! Only MRAs question and understand society! If only more men could take the red pill and really understad that [insert typical MRA beliefs]...

13
theandycc•

[insert typical MRA beliefs]...

The men's rights movement has issues worth talking about, mainly revolving around fathers rights, negative stereotypes of men, male gender roles and the mentality that women are by nature more innocent when they aren't and the consequences of this.

Not to say that feminism is pointless, women's rights has a way to go. But it's not a "MRAs are right, or feminism is right" situation.

The Red Pill refers to realising that men don't have a universally privileged existence but are disadvantaged compared to women in plenty of scenarios too.

5
tygertygerFeminist•

I never said men don't have issues worth talking about. My problem is with how these issues are often presented.

I just think the red pill analogy comes off as silly. I've only come across it on vehemently anti-woman sites that are also the least accurate with information, so it's a little ironic.

6
pterodactylogram•

she's just... not worth the effort.
really.
she'll dismiss it all as 'trolling'. she'll die; her son will, hopefully, go on to be better than she is (as she's speaking on his behalf and all; he may have no idea). either way, let her sit in her delusion. we'll maintain our distance and look on with pity.

13
MsPrynneFeminist•

(as she's speaking on his behalf and all; he may have no idea)

I was wondering as I skimmed through this whether he knows about it and how it would make him feel to know that he's being used as a vehicle for her to espouse these particular ideas.

9
pterodactylogram•

god knows.
i just hope he has the sense to have seen his mother for the deluded old woman she likely is.

5
MeowyPrincess•

I hope her sons future girlfriends/ wife finds his mums blog post & then dumps him over it if he agrees with it.

2
Joyjoyfruits•

I think the main "problem" with that blog, or open letter is simply that it generalizes and it's just so...angry. Assuming that every woman the author's son could ever meet falls into those specific categories seems...narrow minded. And it's bitter. And I tell ya, whatever you want to say about ANY of those descriptions...I'd rather be the worst of any of those scenarios than be bitter. There's a note of angry failure to it. Personally, I'm married and I enjoy traditional gender roles in my home because they simplify the division of labor and traditional gender roles suit me in that I can fill my day with tasks I happen to find fulfilling. But this is without bitterness. If like me, you enjoy the task of running a household, then enjoy! If you enjoy the tasks of being a nurse, a teacher a whatever...enjoy it to its fullest! The anger behind that post always brings up the idea that every major move a woman makes is relative to her future or current interaction with a man. The bitterness in it smacks of a woman who "has had her trials but maintains the role her husband expects" and while that is noble, it falls short of freedom and true suffrage. It isn't about fulfilling a role in relation to a man, it's about fulfilling your idea of who you were meant to be. It isn't a labor of anger or indifference, it is a labor of happiness and liberty. And to me the fact that the only feminine character the author is able to paint is an angry, bitter character, tells me that may be the extent of her experience with women making choices. Presumably, her own choices are a collection of anger, bitterness, selfishness, and regret. When the idealist in you dies, so do the positive ideas. I hope the author finds something about women to inspire her, since she so clearly lacks that from within. Those are the words of someone who's wings have been clipped.

11
lumpyspacelady•

that was horrible.

8
MFDoomEsqFeminist Ally•

You don't have to go past the second sentence to realize this woman is a total loon. Parents who describes their own children as "hot" or "kind of hot" give me the willies, and, imo, are not to be trusted.

8
P_L_U_R_E•

Agreed. The only person I've known like that was an ex whose mom used to talk about him that way, with creepy sexual undertones. They had a very very weird relationship.

5
[deleted]•

Parents who describes their own children as "hot" or "kind of hot" give me the willies

That's a sad attitude to have.

0
MFDoomEsqFeminist Ally•

I disagree. Hot implies sexual attraction specifically. If you are sexually attracted to your child, that is a problem.

14
[deleted]•

I've described my sister as "hot" before, and I've never been sexually attracted to her. It's just an acknowledgement that the person is aesthetically attractive.

-2
tygertygerFeminist•

Ehh... I don't know about that. If my dad said I'm hot I'd be a little grossed out. I wouldn't describe any male relatives as hot and I'm pretty sure that if I told a platonic male friend I thought he was hot he'd get the wrong idea. "Hot" implies sexual attraction in particular.

I'm not going to claim anything about how the author feels about her son- I'm just saying I think the word choice is odd.

16
MFDoomEsqFeminist Ally•

The distinction between calling someone "beautiful" or "handsome" and calling that person "hot" is that "beautiful" and "handsome" refer to whether a person meets certain aesthetic characteristics, "hot" refers to sexual attractiveness (obviously there is overlap between aesthetic beauty and sexual attractiveness, I wouldn't suggest otherwise). See the Webster Definition 2.b(1) and (2) and consider the terms "hot and bothered," "I've got the hots for him/her" etc. This is why you never hear adults calling a baby "hot," rather they say "Oh what a beautiful baby!"

When you call your sister hot, you either misuse the word or find her sexy.

12
P_L_U_R_E•

Ohgod. Imagining describing my brother as "hot" to anyone gave me literal chills. Yuck. He's a handsome and well rounded young man, but I'll leave the "hot" adjective to people who want to have sex with him.

4

Fucking hell I couldn't even finish reading it. And the comments! Ah!

7
beadloom•

" And you’ll go home alone every night to your cats, your Facebook Friends, and your vibrator. I sure hope that’s what you want."

ummm yeah, that is all I want!!! XD Feminism FTW

7
rubysparks•

Good. Her son can take his ball and go home. We don't want to play with him anyway.

7
HertzaHaeonAtheist Feminism•

When you see the Spearhead linked, you stop reading, wash your eyes with soap and go hug your loved ones.

When even r/mensrights avoids it, it's a good sign to stay away.

7
[deleted]•

[deleted]

4
HertzaHaeonAtheist Feminism•

I meant The Spearhead, not the article. Obviously the article's message is well received.

5
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
fozzi_bexar•

I read the letter and was rather upset. And then I read the comments and my stomach dropped when I found there were so many agreements and encouraging words.

My stomach only dropped further though when I googled the term "Red Pill" in association with Mens Rights (it was used often in the comments). I never knew the term existed outside of the film "The Matrix" and...well...its pretty awful.

6
amazinguser•

As a fairly rational and logical man who has been through a terrible divorce and won custody of my son (his mother was into drugs and was extremely unfit) the 'Red Pill' movement holds a large amount of truth at its core.

That being said, it's full of bitterness and some hate because the people who have 'swallowed the pill' have been through some really painful things, usually at the hands of vindictive women who had the support of family courts. I saw this firsthand. I am a pretty smart guy: I have an MS in Physics, I'm in a very stable job, work only 40 hours a week with great benefits, I love spending time with my family and am active in my children's lives. Even so, the courts saw the job as a way to support my ex-wife and son, not a measure of my responsibility or commitment to my family. It took a very stressful 18 months to finally get him into a safe and stable environment, and the only reason I managed it was because she spent all her money on drugs and couldn't pay her attorney anymore, so we settled out of court.

I was shocked by the amount of discrimination I encountered from the courts. The first judge we had gave her temporary custody even though she had no source of income, no place to live (we mutually agreed to leave the home we had shared, so we both had to find a place), had proven her inability to provide consistent supervision of the child, and no motivation to change any of that. I was floored. She basically told me that it's better for the child to be with the mother, even when the father is willing and able to care for the child and can provide a safer and healthier environment.

But the thing that really got me was when the second judge ruled that I had to pay her child support when we submitted an agreement for shared custody. 50% of the time our son would be with her, 50% of the time he would be with me, but I still had to pay her 20% of what I made, plus provide him with insurance, and day care.

Anyway, this has run way longer than I intended and still hasn't really said much of anything.

TL;DR - The 'Red Pill' movement is full of some pretty jaded and angry men, but at its core there are issues that pushed them there, so it does have some merit.

19
MsPrynneFeminist•

so many agreements and encouraging words.

Oh my God Atlas is shrugging nnnooooooo.

I'm kind of fine with people who feel this way opting out of society to avoid paying taxes so as not to support ornamental female public servants, if indeed that is a thing that people do.

3
[deleted]•

[deleted]

-1
[deleted]•

[deleted]

-6
ChuckgoferFeminist Ally•

She's already wrong. I'm a guy.

6
hmbmellyFeminist•

Jesus. It sounds like it was written by an MRA. My favorite line was about "competitive" women only getting ahead by threatening sexual harrassment lawsuits.

If you dig in the comments though, it turns out that this woman is a fundie nightmare, so no worries.

Edit: Not a fundie. Just a sexist asshole.

5†
Driversuz•

Totally not a fundie. Sorry!

-6
Super_Human•

The most shocking part was that this was written by a woman. Women hating women is the reason why feminism isn't as strong as it should be.

She claims that feminists are independent, arrogant, bitchy, and whatnot. But it sounds like she's just talking about women in general because anyone with the ability to think knows feminism isn't about making women "superior." She basically is saying she really hates other women. Probably because they are attractive to her son and she isn't. Seriously... it sounds like she's in love with him. It's quite weird.

5
[deleted]•

[deleted]

0
tygertygerFeminist•

She claims that feminists are independent, arrogant, bitchy, and whatnot. But it sounds like she's just talking about women in general because anyone with the ability to think knows feminism isn't about making women "superior." She basically is saying she really hates other women.

And you've chosen to ignore what Super_Human said. Oh, the irony...

7
Super_Human•

I would address her criticism if it could be considered criticism. But she sounds like she's just ranting about everyone except herself. There's not much to say.

Why exactly are you attacking me? If you don't like her little rant, then we're on the same page here.

7
[deleted]•

[deleted]

-6
tygertygerFeminist•

Oh hey, it's you again.

Maybe you could make a well-reasoned argument and then we can discuss it?

This trend of you accusing others of tossing ad hominems while making ad hominem arguments at the same time is mildly amusing, but quickly getting dull and certainly not adding anything to the discussion.

You're playing into the stereotype of the MRA who attacks feminists but has no points to make of his own. Hey, nevermind, this actually is fun!

9
squigglesthepig•

At first I thought you were just an angry little person, but then that last line let me know you were a troll.

8
Super_Human•

Lol, well pardon me for not living up to your standards over the Internet. We're not all a perfect balance. I don't think the lady's rant about her son not being able to find a non-feminist wife is worthwhile enough to take the time to critique thoroughly.

You're free to share your thoughts about her rant though instead of accusing me of being a "bad" feminist. My comment was my impression of her rant. It's not a review.

1
[deleted]•

I spent the entire article saying 'What. What. WHAT.' at increasingly louder volume. I cannot believe that people think like this.

5
justabutterfly•

It sounds like Oedipus is her favourite story and she wants to ride her son's cock. And also like she is slightly resentful of the choices she's made. Which is why she clearly doesn't get that feminism is about being free to make choices...

4
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
Driversuz•

Kind of shocking isn't it, to see a woman who can acknowledge that her son is masculine, and not see it a defect. So shocking, apparently, that it must mean she wants to have sex with him. A woman admiring any man for something besides his ability to provide her with sex and money, is an entirely foreign concept to you, isn't it?

-10
[deleted]•

[deleted]

11
justabutterfly•

What on earth makes you think I look at men as something to just provide me with sex and money? I just ended a relationship with a man who was an alcoholic who verbally abused me and trashed people's cars because he was in denial about his issues, and used the "but I bought you so many things" as a reason for me to stay in the relationship. I am in my early 30's, have had very few sexual partners, yet it seems like all the men want women who have no self respect because they don't have standards. If your son is so masculine, he does not need his mother feeling sorry for him. Men still hold all the power in the world, do not make it easier for them to play the victim.

My mother also admires my brother...but she doesn't slag off the women in world because, in her words: Women's lib has nothing to do with criticising women, and everything to with supporting myself.

Why on earth would you want to post something like this in here???

8
tygertygerFeminist•

Why on earth would you want to post something like this in here???

Driversuz is apparently the author of the blog post.

http://www.reddit.com/r/mensrightsactivists/comments/z4tj1/seattle_mra_goes_live_first_poster_run_in_the/c61hr6x

9
DerpaNerb•

Men still hold all the power in the world

Which men? All men?

3
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
[deleted]•

[deleted]

5
tygertygerFeminist•

A woman admiring any man for something besides his ability to provide her with sex and money, is an entirely foreign concept to you, isn't it?

Yes, which is why traditional gender roles, which do dictate male-female interaction based on reproduction and financial stability, are so embraced by feminists.

I like you. You're funny :)

7
justabutterfly•

She is funny, isn't she? Makes me glad I have cats. She's done nothing but make me glad I'm single. Can you imagine having to deal with her as a mother in law?

7
tygertygerFeminist•

Ugh. I'm amused at the level of misogyny and poor reasoning but I bet the novelty would wear off real fast.

5
DerpaNerb•

I think the author of this blog was actually talking about traditional gender roles. Well, women wanting to be the traditional female role... with a mix of "GRRLL Power". The two are simply not compatible.

You can't expect a man to primarily support himself and you,which is what happened in traditional gender roles (and please don't call that male privilege... it's not a privilege if it's not a choice... it's a responsibility that men had whether they liked it or not) while also being entitled to what that man has... ESPECIALLY in a world where marriage is just totally one-sided in the women's favor.

If you don't do this, then this article doesn't apply to you.

3
tygertygerFeminist•

I think what the author meant was that traditional gender roles and feminism often contradict each other, and because women sometimes try to adhere to both (or are pressured to adhere to both), conflict results. There was a lot of misogyny and other crap to wade through in order to get to any sort of coherent point so I could be wrong.

You seem to have an odd interpretation of what feminists think male privilege is, but I guess that's a topic for another time.

9
DerpaNerb•

I didn't realize you were being sarcastic at first with the "masculine as a defect" comment.

Phew.

1
jessaholic•

This is concern trolling to the max.

4
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1