I know LoL is a dirty word here, but has anyone else been watching the Riot run LCS?
Riot started a league that does a lot of things we've wished for in NA/EU, but haven't really achieved with weekend tournaments. A long-term weekly format where the stakes still feel high. The start of every broadcast recaps the team stories, rivalries, and upsets and include tons of player interviews. Before every match there's always a little video piece to give it some context.
They also salaried the teams that qualified, and helped them set up houses. This bridged the gap from really good amateurs to pros, a gap that's getting larger and larger in SC2.
I doubt Blizzard has the money to do this themselves, but I dunno maybe they could help set it up? Could NASL take some notes from the format?
Posted Feb 23, 2013, 6:29 AM UTC
LCS pisses all over anything Blizzard has done thus far with eSports and quite frankly it's a wake-up call to step up their game.
Blizzard isn't even trying to be what Riot is to LoL though. At least, they don't appear to be from anything they have said or done.
I don't think Blizzard's strategic direction is the same as Riot's. If Blizzard makes it a long term vision to really make e-sports big, then I would see more involvement.
I don't see it as a wake-up call to do anything.
I thought it had been agreed that LoL and Sc2 are very different games and therefore a comparison between Riot and Blizzard is kind of meaningless.
I didn't agree to that.
LoL and SC2 may be very different games, but the role of Riot and Blizzard are not different. Riot is incredibly involved in the active growth of LoL. Their LCS is very well produced, and fosters talent all over the world. The fact that they have teams on SALARY to play professionally shits on anything Blizzard does alone. The main problem of playing video games professionally outside of Korea is the size of countries and the cost of living. Riot is singlehandedly taking on that burden so that the best players can rise to shine, and the up-and-comers can give it their best and have their time in the lime light. Blizzard has had WCS. That's basically it. But guess what? The seeding system was flawed (Germany had direct seeds to the finals, and Sweden had seeds to Europe finals). The finals production was severely lacking. And along my previous point, IT WAS ALL ESTABLISHED PROFESSIONALS. LCS has that. LCS also has Vulcan. LCS has the new coL team. They have GGU. They have GIANTS, Dragonborns, so many up and coming teams that foster growth and innovation within the scene. Blizzard has yet to do anything close to that. So if anyone "hates" LoL, give props to Riot for doing what Blizzard fails to.
basically what I mean is that the success of riot and the success of LoL as an esport are very closely connected whereas blizzard is still going to sell millions of copies of the next WoW expansion regardless of the success of Sc2.
Sc2 has pretty much turned to the community and other organisations to drive sc2 esports on and blizzard is just something we can whine about when it is a slow news day.
he is taking about "e-sports" promotions, player exposure and making a good living for the pros. Not the actual game.
Sc2 and LoL are different "e-sports" though so I don't see what the point of comparing them is.
now I can argue with that argument