washingtonpost.comPosted Apr 25, 2013, 2:29 AM UTC
[deleted]
I see no faces, no guns and no bombs. Perhaps if this witness chose to use the "record" function on his iPhone then maybe we could have at least proven that whoever those two were, one or both were firing weapons. These pics don't show much at all.
[deleted]
Can you point me to any evidence that one was "executed"?
He was killed. Unless there is evidence of weapons and gunfire against the police then by definition he was executed. The MSM telling me he threw homemade bombs at the police is not evidence. The dead cop could have very easily been a result of friendly fire so that isn't evidence either.
I asked if you had evidence that he was executed.
You don't seem to understand the question. I want proof that he was killed in self-defence. Can you give it to me? Can you provide me with credible eye witness accounts? Even a photoshopped picture of weapons at the scene will appease me. Anything. What the MSM says may be all the proof you need but it isn't enough for me.
I do understand the question.
My point is that you seem to have no problem "seeing that he was executed" without evidence. Yet you NEED evidence to prove he wasn't.
Wouldn't it be more honest to say that you would like to see evidence that could prove or disprove either?
Otherwise it seems like you are just out to prove that this is a conspiracy.
[deleted]