Playing Deal Breaker should also make you pay for the set
I know Deal Breaker is supposed to be the most broken card in the game, but it feels overwhelmingly strong sometimes — you get a completed set out of nowhere, and someone else loses 3 properties they’ve been building up, all for just 1 card!
A rule I’ve been trying is that you have to pay the targeted player for the value of the properties (as well as any buildings that are on it.) It’s still an incredibly strong card, but it leaves the player a bit more vulnerable to being targeted with rent. Plus, it doesn’t feel as bad for the targeted player since they get some cash out of it.
Thoughts?
Posted May 31, 2024, 9:43 PM UTC