Correcting the Cuckoo Birds

Friends, Happy Independence Day which just happens to be on July 4th.

Victory is around the corner because lawfare is now null and void thanks to SCOTUS who has ended lawfare once and for all.

This is what SCOTUS ruled:

"Under our constitutional structure of separated powers, the nature of Presidential power entitles a former President to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority. And he is entitled to at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts. There is no immunity for unofficial acts."

I don't have to tell you that this has induced an implosion of the Mainstream Media MSM.

Why have I bolded "for actions within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority"? Because, as it pertains to the limits of what leronlimab can do, it has powerful effects against disease both preclusively and conclusively.

What is the definition of preclusive?

"preventing something from happening, or making it impossible for it to happen"

Preclusivity would be the administration of leronlimab in order to prevent any of its indicated disease processes from beginning or occurring.

What is the definition of conclusive?

"proving that something is true, or ending any doubt"

Conclusivity would be the administration of leronlimab in order to halt the progression of and to completely end any of its indicated disease processes.

The FDA's decision to lift the clinical hold (akin to granting absolute immunity) proves leronlimab as safe and effective. Leronlimab has been used both as a prophylactic to either slow the progression of or prevent the development of a disease process as well as in the direct and absolute treatment to completely eradicate a disease within its range of indications. Within its lists of indications, certainly, very mild side effects could and probably do occur, but in fact, it is considered and verified as very safe. It is also very effective in both the prevention of and treatment of inflammatory as well as immunogenic variations of disease.

In the analogy I've set up pertaining to SCOTUS, the FDA (SCOTUS) has essentially said that leronlimab/CytoDyn cannot be held liable for any deaths or Severe Adverse Events which may have occurred as a result of preclusive or conclusive leronlimab treatment in the past, present or future. Why not? Because it has been found to be safe and effective (absolutely immune), which enabled it to become lifted from clinical hold.

Essentially, this means that the FDA just handed leronlimab the keys to an approval. It has become now a foregone conclusion. Leronlimab just needs now to go out and prove once and for all that it is all that it is cracked up to be and therefore, meets or exceeds statistical significance on multiple fronts in the coming trials.

Really, what Big Pharma has become angry about now is not that leronlimab is permitted to be trialed, but rather, that they no longer have anything of any weight or substance with which they can throw at leronlimab. They have exhausted their ammunition banks and have nothing better than all that which they've already expended, and all that which they know cannot measure up. They are angry because, in essence, their charade is over.

Big Pharma really created King Leronlimab. Leronlimab was out just doing its own thing. Really, it just wanted to be left alone, helping people. It was a humanity helper. It had a sense of morals which BP intensely hated. BP didn't want the drug outdoing them, so they jumped on its back in an attempt to suffocate it, to stop its progression. They even riled up the FDA all over it with false accusations, to the point where the clinical hold became necessary to be imposed. This forced CytoDyn to go through hell and back proving out leronlimab's safety and efficacy. But this backfired on Big Pharma because, they are left with the same old leronlimab it had to contend with as prior, just as safe and just as effective as it ever had been, but now, Big Pharma now needed to deal with the same moral and harmless drug, but this time vindicated and validated, proudly displaying a stamp of acceptance by the US FDA.

Who is left then, for them to blame for this, other than themselves? The war was originally waged in HIV and then it flowed into mTNBC. In these indications, G was leronlimab's main competitor. Ever since the very beginning, CytoDyn experienced significant opposition and much of it, was likely generated by G. IMHO, G had a gig going to purposely sabotage CytoDyn for ever so long. In the end, CytoDyn was able to beat G by their own game. But what did that win require? It required that the FDA step in and protect the methods of medicine itself. Sure, it required a significant contribution of hard work from CytoDyn, but, in the end, the FDA made the necessary and correct final decision.

Once leronlimab starts hitting its goals, once it starts hitting the mark, (and it will), listen and watch for all the complaints about "how this once held -mab, now is poised up against mCRC, but be careful, watch out because it was previously on a clinical hold, so don't trust the results or findings". G built and created the gallows for leronlimab, but they themselves shall hang from them. Had they never pushed in the first place, CytoDyn never would have pushed back. The FDA would not have been necessary to rule in favor of leronlimab. Now, the FDA has already accepted all the data for safety and efficacy and CytoDyn no longer requires establishing that standard another time. All that work has been completed.

The leronlimab which we all know, love and affirm to be true, safe as water and effective against any CCR5 mediated disease, was put on trial for those very things which we shareholders knew to be and took for granted as true. That leronlimab was effective against HIV, against mTNBC, against COVID, against ARDS, against Septic Shock, against Glioblastoma Multiforme, Alzheimer's and on and on and on. That was G's form of lawfare, to broadcast lies against their now self-proclaimed King Leronlimab who nobody but G crowned as King and over whom G shall soon cry profusely which is G's own fault as they did it to themselves. We suffered as they were Gaslighting, that is humiliating the drug who we so fervently believed in, before the entire world, which we know and believe to be as safe as water; but that persecution / gaslighting / lawfare was permitted and we suffered through it for 2.5 long years, but it was allowed because the creatures like G would soon create their Crowned King.

Had G left leronlimab well enough alone, they would never have learned their lesson, that this drug is like no other. It ain't like any other monoclonal antibody. The fact is that when you push against this drug, all they really are doing is increasing the blessing upon the drug. Leronlimab today is wears a crown created by the FDA because G wielded a weapon which they enabled and enlisted against CytoDyn.

Stay away from those who become or act like "Victims" in the problems they themselves create. That is Twatwaffles 101. Twatwaffles are soon to become the Victim. Watch and listen for evidence of this in their posts. They begin to cry about the King who they have created. They attacked a drug which they knew to be superior and replaced it with an inferior drug through their clandestine conspiracy and turned the FDA on the company in an attempt to root it out entirely. But instead of a conviction which G had desperately anticipated, they instead received a vindication and a vacation of any sentencing. Nothing further to prove except its own level of statistical significance, its own level of clinical safety and efficacy. Essentially, the matter closed, it is only a matter of time. The end game is already known. It is a moot point to discuss how. G created a mess for themselves because they got the exact opposite of what they hoped for.

In continuation of the analogy with the decision of SCOTUS, this is my message to Sidley Austin and also to the attorneys defending NP:

"No official acts of leronlimab can be used as evidence in any case against the company. Nothing that pertains to its official capacity can ever be used as evidence against the company, even in an unrelated case." These official duties of leronlimab which consists of the blockade of CCR5 cannot be used as evidence against CytoDyn. Any official act of leronlimab entered as evidence against CytoDyn is illegal.

Potentially, some of the evidence which Amarex/KK presents in their defense could in fact be illegal and should be disallowed from being presented to the Arbiter/Court. Why did Amarex/KK fail to perform their duty described within the MSA which they agreed to and signed? Were they under the assumption that leronlimab was not safe or effective? Did they believe that leronlimab would fail anyway, giving them the excuse of what was the point of continuing work to submit an appropriate document? It was definitively proven acceptable to the FDA that leronlimab is safe and effective, so that would be a faulty argument and would not be acceptable to be used against CytoDyn in that arbitration/court. Whatever the drug was guilty of, provided those results were within its preclusive and conclusive authority of overcoming the indicated diseases, none of any of that can be used as evidence against CytoDyn/NP as to be reasons why Amarex/KK did not live up to its/his obligation.

It wasn't simply good enough for G to sink CytoDyn/NP via the Amarex/KK pathway. No, in addition to that, they were compelled to get a clinical hold imposed upon leronlimab which handcuffed CytoDyn/NP as well and indirectly led to CytoDyn/CA entirely dropping the HIV-MDR BLA. If G had stopped at Amarex/KK alone, CytoDyn/NP would have been unshackled and therefore might have risked a future FDA BLA approval by believing that all was A-OK, and then, after its submission, down the road a bit, being told by the FDA, that safety and efficacy were still a point which required proving!! That would mean that the FDA approval of a future BLA would have been significantly delayed because the work necessary to validate safety and efficacy would still need to be done before any approval could be granted. But now, all that work is already done thanks to G. Safety and efficacy have been proven through the process of getting the hold lifted, and now no longer requires any further validation.

If G had waited, without immediately ensuring that a clinical hold be imposed upon leronlimab/CytoDyn subsequently permitting CytoDyn/NP to proceed ahead without a care in the world, then CytoDyn/NP/CA/JL would have subsequently brought another BLA before the FDA, such as in the case of this current mCRC indication, and a request for BLA approval by the FDA would be submitted and then following all the hype which would be generated surrounding a pending BLA approval, the FDA would then come back and say, "you haven't proven leronlimab's safety yet"!! That won't be happening anymore thanks to G.

Now, with all that hard work already out of the way, the potential roadblocks have been removed and now, the road is clear of potholes and obstacles. CytoDyn now need only make the long drive awake and with a clear head and it can be certain and assured that they reach their goal. With that clear, obstacle free road ahead of them, they can be hopeful for significant capital investment once the coming trials initiate.

Leronlimab is a drug of destiny. Call it what you want. Even in the jungle, you have lions, and you have rabbits. That doesn't mean that the rabbit is any worse than the lion, but the lion is born with a different destiny than the rabbit. There are certain drugs born with a different destiny and leronlimab is one of those drugs. Victory and approval are inevitable. There is no substitute of this drug.

Leronlimab has 3 responsibilities, 1) To block HIV from entering CD4 T cells via CCR5 blockade, 2) To reduce Active Immunity via CCR5 blockade and 3) To reduce Inflammation via CCR5 blockade. Anything leronlimab does within this limited scope of authority, (it might be limited, but that limitation is over 90 indications wide and growing, and the scope is the outer perimeter of this list of 90 indications), whatever is necessary and whatever it takes to perform and accomplish those 3 responsibilities, the company is absolutely immune from prosecution because the drug has already been declared as safe. What do G's complaints become, that "leronlimab is allowed to kill the patients it treats because it has the seal of safety"? That "leronlimab is permitted to be used in any indication that exists just because of its safety seal"? Cockamamie ideas? Absolutely cockamamie, but what else can we expect from G, or from the Twatwaffles? This is the Gaslighting of leronlimab which they are experts at.

Rather, should not G be held accountable for what has happened to CytoDyn as a consequence of their fear of leronlimab, as a consequence of their Gaslighting of leronlimab and of CytoDyn? Are their actions in line with helping humanity or in line with helping G? The FDA told the citizens of the US that there is no way to make this system of drug authorization function properly if drug companies don't put forth decent drugs to be evaluated. The system does have in place some checks and balances, but all systems are flawed in one way or another. The system has been designed mainly for virtuous drugs and not for imposters. It is coming to light though, that what we are seeing, are the chickens coming home to roost. The FDA admits to the world, that in some infrequent cases, they have no way to restrain a bad and immoral drug.

The FDA parsed through at least 10 years of trial data which leronlimab participated in. Leronlimab proved itself to the FDA and because of that, the FDA has given leronlimab and CytoDyn a great amount of power along with legal latitude to do that which it deems necessary within its preclusive and conclusive authority to become approved in the future. But the good thing is that leronlimab is a virtuous drug which has humans at heart. It is the type of drug which the FDA expects to evaluate. A drug that is known to be safe. A drug that is effective.

The FDA does not control the Big Pharmaceuticals who present their drugs before them. The Big Pharmas create the drugs they want to sell and present them to the FDA for approval. That responsibility of bringing good, clean and harmless yet effective drugs is placed upon the pharmaceuticals. The unfortunate thing is that BP has no use for helping humanity unless it also becomes extremely profitable. Profit is at the top of the list for Big Pharma but helping humanity is not necessarily the primary factor. Profit rather, is the main interest which BP has in mind, not the concern of helping humanity. This is what the FDA cannot control. In the model used today, the FDA is forced to depend upon this principle, that the drugs they are approving are meant for human benefit first and foremost and not necessarily for drug company profit.

How many years of trials did the COVID vaccination participate in? How many years did it prove itself to the FDA in accordance with proper vaccine development, before it found FDA approval? How many deaths resulted as a consequence of the medication, following its approval? What did it do to warrant the massive authority granted to it? (Needing a card showing you've received 3 doses or else no work, or else no entry, or else no travel, etc...) Yet, it was approved, because the FDA expected that the drug was moral, and it relied on the track record of the Big Pharma who was putting forth the medication in order to approve the untested vaccine.

Drug companies have huge power bringing forth whatever they want to the FDA, especially with the help of drug lobbyists and through special interest groups and their deep pockets with which they persuade. This is a slippery slope, and it needs to be treaded with care. The FDA cannot remove the immorality built into the drugs which it could approve, so concern and care need to be implemented within the drugs initially, before they are brought to be assessed. This responsibility falls in the laps of the drug designers and the health of the citizens falls also into their hands. It has come to the point where many are allowed to die, only to save a couple. How are immoral drugs constrained? With much difficulty.

But leronlimab is not immoral and requires no constraining. Yet, it was blamed with much and because of that blame, paid the highest price for things it never did. That, however, was their very intention. It is what they intended for leronlimab, to be constrained indefinitely, but they failed in their attempt.

BP really needs to consider carefully what they present to the FDA if they are interested in helping humanity. The problem cannot be fixed by the FDA. When morality is removed from the drug designers, when human beings are physically altered by these drugs, which is happening all throughout medicine, then consider what is moral and what is immoral and then decide whether to present that drug for approval. But BP has their own definition for what is moral and what is immoral. They simply replace truth with lies and nothing is done about it. So, the FDA is beholden to that which is presented to them and therefore, it should be required that those drugs presented to the FDA are brought forth to them with intentions for human health, human benefit and inevitably prove to be for the most part safe and effective.

The system we have in place helps humanity only if the drugs brought to the FDA are virtuous. Leronlimab has a lifetime record of virtuosity. The FDA can be assured that any approval they make for leronlimab would never be returned back on them as a faulty decision.

Sit back, relax and watch. It is coming Folks. It is beginning to fall into place. It can still go back and forth, teetering. I'm still trying to figure out why CytoDyn dropped the MD Anderson mCRC Human trial. It is all moot. It does not matter. Why? Cause I know the end. We are sitting at a game, and we know who is going to win. We are waiting for the first piece to fall into place. That will enable the other pieces to fit. And who is on our side? You guessed it, the FDA.