17.2.6-17.2.9 Diamond Sutra

17.2.6 Faith to Have

Guanyin Bodhisattva reported to Buddha again: Social Honor! Will there be many sentient beings in future, later hours, later minutes, later 500 years, to the time of correct law extinction is turning on, upon hearing this color (1) classic sentences, will they bear factual thinks?

Buddha said: Don’t say that! But again, Benevolent Manifestation! There are Bodhisattvas and Mahasattvas in the coming future, later hours, later minutes, later 500 years, at the correct law extinction time is turning on, fully possessing Sal Fasullo, fully possessing virtues, fully possessing gnosis (2). Again next, Benevolent Manifestation! Those Bodhisattvas and Mahasattvas aren’t undertaking and commonwealth-ing at one Buddha place, aren’t being projected benevolent roots by one Buddha. To say it again, Benevolent Manifestation! Those Bodhisattvas and Mahasattvas aren’t undertaking and commonwealth-ing at one, hundred, thousand Buddha places, aren’t being projected benevolent roots by one, hundred, thousand Buddhas, so they can hear this color classic sentences, should gain one immaculate faithful heart.

Benevolent Manifestation! Thus-Come by its Buddha’s intelligence has known them all; Thus-Come by its Buddha’s eye has seen them all. Benevolent Manifestation! “Tathagata” has perceived that those all-sentient beings should bear boundless fortunate aggregates, should assimilate boundless fortunate aggregates, wherein? Benevolent Manifestation! Those Bodhisattvas and Mahasattvas have no I think turning, no sentient think, no living think, no warrior think (i.e., daily life people’s thinks), no hobbyhorse (Pudgala) think, no intent born think, no Abel (Manava) think, no creator think, and no acceptor think turning.

Benevolent Manifestation! Those Bodhisattvas and Mahasattvas have no juristic think turning, no non-juristic think turning, no think turning and no non-think turning (3), what’s so ever? Benevolent Manifestation! If Bodhisattvas and Mahasattvas have juristic thinks turning, they should have I obsession, sentient obsession, living obsession, hobbyhorse etc. obsessions. If they have non-juristic thinking, also they should have I obsession, sentient obsession, living obsession, hobbyhorse etc. obsessions, wherein? Benevolent Manifestation! Shouldn’t fetch law; shouldn’t fetch non-law! Hence Tathagata intimately said the raft metaphor juristic door (4). Wiser, all laws should be severed, none the less illegality!

​

https://preview.redd.it/0q1qhugr69jd1.jpg?width=2158&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5a0f2aa0a5a41f88fa55977d988b23ea51cb8ccf

Annotation 17.2.6-1, Color means Color Node, cf. section 11.4.1.

Annotation 17.2.6-2, section 16.2 talks about the “fully possessing Sal Fasullo”, section 13.4.4 talks about the 25 haves that are all virtues, and section 11.6.4 talks about the “Enlightenment Branch Laws” that are all gnosis.

Annotation 17.2.6-3, The “no think turning and no non-think turning” is a description of Nirvana (see fig. 17.2.6-2), is a “pervasively constant (color) place”, also known as No Objectively Have Sky, Constant Silent Light Sky, Delicately Wonderful Original Heart, Empty After All, etc.

Annotation 17.2.6-4, the raft metaphor juristic door is a fable that a man crafts a raft to cross a river; after aboard another shore, he abandons the raft and does not continue his journey with the raft burden on his head.

17.2.7 Gainless, Nothing to Say

Buddha asked full-life Guanyin Bodhisattva again: Benevolent Manifestation! What do you think? Are there few laws being depended on, so Tathagata testified and gained Anuttara-Samyak-Sambodhi (i.e., Upmost Correct-Equality Correct-Perception)? Are there few laws spoken by Tathagata when he was in the stillness of Anuttara-Samyak-Sambodhi?

Guanyin replied: Social Honor! Allow me to explain what Buddha said! There aren’t few laws, by which Tathagata proved and gained Upmost Correct-Equality Correct-Perception, and no minor laws were spoken when Tathagata was in the stillness of Upmost Correct-Equality Correct-Perception, wherein? Social Honor! All laws testified, spoken, thought by Tathagata, all are non-fetchable, unspeakable, not laws, not non-laws, wherein? Because holy sage Hobbyhorses (i.e., Pudgala) are manifestations of “None As” (cf. 11.6.4 Off-is Fruit).

17.2.8 Legal Birth

Buddha asked Guanyin Bodhisattva: Benevolent Manifestation! According to your intention, what say you? 18,000 yojanas to the northwest of here, on the banks of the Rhine River, there is a pair of benevolent men and faithful women, namely Tanngnjóstr and Tanngrisnir (see fig. 17.2.15; cf. section 15.3 “Human Sky Fruit”). They use fulfilling the Three-Grand Great-Grand Worlds of seven treasures to broadly donate, does the two gain fortunate aggregates many?

​

https://preview.redd.it/vwtwbtos69jd1.jpg?width=760&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9d2899d5ef6870ad656bc0336e2674470916443d

Guanyin Bodhisattva answered: Very Many! Social Honor! Much Many, Benevolent Renunciation! The benevolent man or a faithful woman, Tanngnjóstr and Tanngrisnir, due to the deed, bears quantity of fortunate aggregates very much, wherein? Social Honor! Fortunate virtuous aggregates fortunate virtuous aggregates, Tathagata said, aren’t fortunate virtuous aggregates, therefore, Tathagata said names of fortunate virtuous aggregates fortunate virtuous aggregates (1).

Buddha told Guanyin Bodhisattva again: Benevolent Manifestation! Such as a benevolent man or a faithful woman uses fulfilling the Three-Grand Great-Grand Worlds of seven treasures to donate. Such as a benevolent man or a faithful woman on the teachings, down to only four paragraphs of words, accepts, holds, reads, recites, finalizes to getting benefit, preaches and exemplifies to others, according to its theories to make intents; by the dos, the born fortunate aggregates are innumerable times more than the earlier, wherein? All Tathagatas corresponding to “correct equality enlightenment” are born from this sutra; all Buddhas, Social Honors are born from this sutra, wherein? Benevolent Manifestation! Buddha’s laws, Buddha’s laws, Tathagata says, aren’t Buddha’s laws, therefore Tathagata says names of Buddha’s laws Buddha’s laws (2).

Annotation 17.8-1, The first “fortunate aggregates” is mundane victorious significance, the second “fortunate aggregates”, is victorious significance of transcending mundane world.

Annotation 17.2.8-2, the first word "Buddha’s Laws" is the mundane victorious significance, and the second word "Buddha’s Laws" means the Victorious Significance of the transcending mundane world.

17.2.9 Forbidden Fruit

Buddha asked Guanyin Bodhisattva: according to your intention, what say you? Do “Entering Stream (in Sanskrit is Sotapanna)” shamans often make the spell that “I can prove Entering Stream Fruit (1)”?

Guanyin Bodhisattva answered: No, Social Honor! Entering Stream shamans don’t make the spell that “I can prove and gain Entering Stream fruit”, wherein? Social Honor! Entering Stream shamans entered nowhere; therefore, Entering Stream is named. Not entering color, sound, incense, taste, touch, and law, hence the name of Entering Stream. Social Honor! If Entering Stream shamans make the spellings that “I can prove Entering Stream fruit”, that is having obsession of I, of sentient, living, warrior, hobbyhorse, etc.

Buddha asked Guanyin Bodhisattva: according to your intention, what say you? Do “One Come (in Sanskrit is Sakadagami)” shamans often make the spell that “I can prove and gain One Come fruit”?

View Sound Bodhisattva answered: No, Social Honor! One Come shamans don’t make the spell that “I can prove and gain One Come fruit”, wherein? Social Honor! Due to “not few laws” to prove nature of One Come, hence the name One Come.

Buddha asked Guanyin Bodhisattva: according to your intention, what say you? Do “No Return (in Sanskrit is Anagami)” shamans often make spell that “I can prove and gain No Return fruit”?

Guanyin Bodhisattva answered: No, Social Honor! No-Return shamans don’t make the spell that “I can prove and gain No Return fruit”, wherein? Social Honor! Because of not having few laws to prove the nature of No Return, hence the name No Return.

Buddha asked Guanyin Bodhisattva: according to your intention, what say you? Do Ararat (in Sanskrit is Arhat, in Pali is Arahant) shamans often make the spell that “I can prove and gain Ararat”? Guanyin Bodhisattva answered: No, Social Honor! Ararats don’t make the spellings that “I can prove and gain Ararat nature”, wherein? Social Honor! Because not having few laws is named as Ararat, due to the reason and factors, the name Ararat. Social Honor! If an Ararat makes the spellings that “I can prove and gain Ararat nature”, that is holding “I”, sentient, living, warrior, hobbyhorse, etc., wherein? Social Honor! “Tathagata” matching with Correct Equality Perception said that I gained “‘Non-Expostulation Dwell’ the Upmost No.1”. Social Honor! Even though I am an Ararat, left greedy desires forever, but I never have the spells that I gained Ararat fruit, severed greedily desires forever. Social Honor! If I make the spell that I gain Ararat, leaving greedily desires afar forever, Tathagata shouldn’t grant remembrance to me, “Benevolence Manifestation, benevolent woman Kubaba (see fig. 17.2.6-35) has gained ‘Non-Expostulation Dwell the Upmost No.1’”. Because of Dwell on nothing, Tathagata said the name of Non-Expostulation Dwell Non-Expostulation Dwell (2).

Annotation 17.2.9-1, for the definition of these four Shamanic fruits, please refer to Section 15.2.4 "Four Shamanic Fruits".

Annotation 17.2.9-2, the first "Non-Expostulation Dwell" is the mundane victorious and the second "Non-Expostulation Dwell" is the victorious significance of transcending mundane world.

↪️Return to Catalog of The Sutra Translation

Posted Aug 17, 2024, 4:47 PM UTC

20
Loading comments…