British tabloids finally report the correct points of Prince Harry's case against RAVEC because it was public but misled the public too long purposefully

The first video clip is misinformation that Prince Harry was seeking the security to be restored as it was when he was a working royal. The new report that followed is more accurate because Prince Harry's hearing was made public.

https://reddit.com/link/1juox0e/video/fmb1ekj28ote1/player

For a long time the British media have simplified Prince Harry's case against Ravec in many different ways. In order to minimise the public support and even put an angle into the misinformation to make them angry. For example at times they have made it seems that

1. He is fighting for security (as if he doesn't have any at all) but he should pay for it as a consequence of stepping back from Royal duty.

2. Harry has bespoke security and that is satisfactory (without highlighting that the bespoke nature is problematic as it puts conditions on him which if properly discusses mean that RAVEC only want him in the UK to support royal family events and do not want him in the UK to push his own projects- more so if they are commercial. In a sense therefore exiling him unless they agree with his reason for coming to the uk which would normally be to support the monarchy or to give the appearance of his deference to it)

3. Kate Mansey put out the lie that Harry wanted the tax payer to fund his security and on that occasion Prince Harry put out a swift statement and this is when the public were informed he was actually fighting to be able to pay for security.

4. After it was known he was willing to pay for security the media put out the notion that it is not possible as the police are not for hire. But they ignored that King Charles had been paying for Prince Andrew's protection as a non working royal for years and probably only stopped this because it could have been used to show the hypocrisy.

5. Not being explicit that the royal household were involved in Ravec's decision and this includes a representative for King Charles

6. Not reporting widely about the leaked email from Priti Patel former Conservative Home Office secretary where she asked King Charles to reconsider Prince Andrew and Harry's security. Obviously that implied that King Charles does have influence with the security for Harry and members of the royal family while Royal reporters try to imply it has nothing to do with him .

7. Repeating the unconfirmed reports that the Queen told Harry he was either in or out and implying that this is connected to him not having security even if he is out. It is not! But not reporting as discovered in one of Prince Harry's cases on the matter that the Queen QE2 had written her request that Harry and Meghan must have adequate security.

8. Making it seem like Harry wanted 24/7 automatic security as if he was a working royal.

It seems that it is only with the Appeal hearing that took place today that they are finally reporting that Prince Harry is not asking for his security to be restored to as it was when he was a working royal but that he is saying that they did not access him according to their criteria of security offered to high profile people in his category or do a proper risk assessment. Instead they singled him out and gave him a bespoke level of security which was different and more inferior than other high profile people. I do believe that this is to punish him for stepping back from the monarchy and to potentially be a factor that add pressure to make him return.

https://preview.redd.it/vol6m0n0hote1.jpg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d02cca532821ed3eb5fd89ccd9a1067481a6f6a7

This is a headline from today and therefore is finally the British media being clearer as to the essence of Prince Harry's main argument with his security.

I think the media only finally reported this correctly now despite it always being in the paper work from previous hearings, because the hearing was public and was live steamed. Clips of Prince Harry's barristers listing his grounds are now available to be seen whereas it was not the case before.

I also suspect that the media are conflicted in wanting Prince Harry punished with only the inferior bespoke security but they are now hearing loud and clear from Harry that if so he will not come to the Uk with Meghan and Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet and despite them always complaining about them, they do want Meghan to acknowledge the UK, visit and they do want some ownership of their children and for them to be in some proximity to the royal family according to their hierarchal lower subservient place.

I am sure that the media rely on them having lied to the public so much already with misinformation that despite the correct reporting, the people that they did influence will now not move from their positions with the clarity that is now available. Obviously what matters is the judges decision but this post is just about how the Machine likes to mould public opinion and try and use it against Prince Harry.