Follow-up question to my previous one (only if you identify as agnostic-atheist)

My previous question was “what is the most sound argument from the other team?”

Many of you wrote “none” or implied that they’re all terrible. But, if you’re an agnostic atheist, by definition you acknowledge that God’s non-existence can’t be known with 100 percent certainty.

Considering this, your position isn’t that God definitely doesn’t exist, but just that you lack a belief due to insufficient evidence or poor arguments.

So my question is: if you, as an agnostic atheist, were to entertain the theoretical possibility of a sound argument for God, then what kind of argument/evidence makes you respect it, even though you might not subscribe fully to it?