Essential Points:

* In 2024, 200 bomb threats were received in polling centers in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, Michigan, and Wisconsin. It's believed that these threats were intended to destabilize the collection of votes in those districts, and opens up opportunities for election manipulation. The majority of these bomb threats were concluded to come from Russian email domains, per FBI investigation.
* In all 7 swing states (Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin), all of the states returned results that favored Trump, and to such a degree that a recount was not deemed necessary.
* Of the districts that flipped from one party to another in this election, all 88 counties that flipped flipped Democrat-to-Republican. This trend hasn't happened since the 1930s
* Two major brands which produce voting equipment for the various voting districts in the US were subject to security breaches from 2020-2024. These brands, combined, produce voting equipment which is used in 70% of the voting districts in the country. Thus, there's a significant risk that the elections in those districts were not secure in 2024.
* The video highlights the election results in Pennsylvania, Nevada, and North Carolina specifically. In all three of these states, analysis noted significant voter trends that were abnormal relative to voter turnout from the state-level elections in that same election cycle (in particular the state superintendent). In North Carolina, specifically, in 2016 voter turnout for the presidential candidates was broadly higher than turnout for the state superintendent elections. Some negatives appeared (indicating less voter turnout than expected), and those negatives were all for the Democratic candidate, and between 1-10% lower than the expected norm. In 2024, in the same state, Voter turnout (relative to the state superintendent election's turnout) was negative in every district, specifically for Democratic candidate Kamala Harris. Negative values went as low as -25% difference. Similarly, Trump, in all of these districts, skewed consistently higher than the state elections.
* In Pennsylvania, the ETA presents the mail-in voter turnouts, also comparing the presidential race turnout to that of the state superintendent. Similar results: the negative turnouts for Harris in-person are almost triple the rate of the mail-in voter turnout, adjusted for size. And Trump's turnout is consistently higher than his mail-in turnout.
* These patterns, with little to no variance, suggest an artificial influence on the results. As if someone had deleted all Harris votes, or replaced all Harris votes with Trump votes, in a limited portion of the election results.
* The ETA cites Dr. Walter, Mebane, a distinguished political scientist and statistician, who is considered an expert in election forensics and statistical analysis of election fraud. In North Carolina, Mebane found roughly 200,000 votes in the election results, which he considered possibly fraudulent. Roughly have of those votes, he is highly confident were manipulated. In NC, Trump's margin of victory was roughly 180,000 votes.
* Mebane conducted a similar study of Pennsylvania: with a 120,000 margin, Mebane found 210,000 votes that were potentially fraudulent.
* While not discussed at-length, similar patterns were found in Wisconsin, Arizona, and Nevada (all swing states). If those 5 states alone were found to be manipulated in the 2024 election, their electoral power would have been enough to affect the results of the presidential election.
* The video also cites studies based on the work of Dr. Peter Klimek, an Austrian physicist and expert on election forensics. Using his methodologies, the ETA shows anomalous trends in NC and PA elections that shift toward Trump, outside of statistical expectations.

Took me some time to go through the video, but here's the Election Truth Alliance's findings on possible election fraud in 2024 (video starts at 47:46, and the explanation of the data is about 25 minutes)