What is the best game recording software for PC in 2025?

TL;DR (Too Long; Didn't Read)

  • For NVIDIA users: ShadowPlay - 1.0% performance impact and Instant Replay make this unbeatable.
  • For everyone else: Bandicam - Most reliable with only 3.2% performance impact and zero crashes in my testing.
  • For streamers: OBS Studio - Despite higher performance impact, streaming features are unmatched.
  • For budget users: OBS Studio - Free and powerful, but requires time investment.
  • Avoid: Fraps - 12.8% performance impact and 47GB file sizes are unacceptable in 2025.

I have been testing various screen recording software during the past few months on multiple systems. Here are the 5 best software for recording gameplay after recording over 200 hours of gameplay footage across different games and hardware configurations.

Testing Setup & Methodology

Primary Test System:

  • CPU: Intel Core i7-12700K
  • GPU: NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti
  • RAM: 32GB DDR4-3200
  • Storage: 1TB NVMe SSD
  • OS: Windows 11 Pro

Secondary Test System:

  • CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
  • GPU: AMD RX 6700 XT
  • RAM: 16GB DDR4-3600
  • Storage: 512GB SATA SSD
  • OS: Windows 10 Pro

Games Tested:

  • Cyberpunk 2077 (demanding AAA)
  • Fortnite (competitive esports)
  • Minecraft (lightweight indie)
  • Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II (fast-paced FPS)
  • Red Dead Redemption 2 (open world)

Testing Parameters:

  • Recording resolution: 1080p60fps
  • Recording duration: 30-minute sessions
  • Multiple tests per game per software
  • Performance monitored with MSI Afterburner
  • File sizes measured after recording

1. Bandicam Game Recorder

Key Features:

  • Records up to 4K Ultra HD at 480 FPS
  • Hardware acceleration support (Intel QSV, NVIDIA NVENC, AMD VCE)
  • 24+ hour continuous recording capability
  • Real-time drawing and annotation tools
  • Multiple recording modes (Screen, Game, Device)
  • Built-in video manager with export options
  • Webcam overlay support
  • Audio recording from multiple sources

My Test Results (30-minute sessions):

Performance Impact (RTX 4070 Ti system):

  • Cyberpunk 2077: 87 FPS → 83 FPS (4.6% drop)
  • Fortnite: 240 FPS → 235 FPS (2.1% drop)
  • COD MW II: 165 FPS → 160 FPS (3.0% drop)
  • Average CPU usage: 6.2%
  • Average RAM usage: 245MB
  • GPU usage increase: 1-2%

Performance Impact (RX 6700 XT system):

  • Cyberpunk 2077: 72 FPS → 68 FPS (5.6% drop)
  • Fortnite: 180 FPS → 175 FPS (2.8% drop)
  • COD MW II: 135 FPS → 130 FPS (3.7% drop)
  • Average CPU usage: 8.1%
  • Average RAM usage: 280MB

File Size Analysis:

  • 30 minutes of 1080p60 gameplay: 6.2GB average
  • Compression ratio: Excellent (smallest files among paid options)
  • Quality: Visually lossless with default settings

Stability Testing:

  • 8-hour continuous recording: No crashes
  • 50+ recording sessions: 2 minor audio sync issues
  • Game compatibility: 100% success rate with all tested games

Pros:

  • Consistently lowest performance impact in my tests
  • File sizes are manageable without quality loss
  • Zero learning curve - worked perfectly out of the box
  • Never crashed during my month of testing
  • Hardware acceleration worked flawlessly on both systems
  • Live drawing feature actually useful for tutorials

Cons:

  • $39.95 price tag (though worth it based on my testing)
  • Struggled on my old test laptop (Core i5-6300U)
  • Limited built-in editing features
  • Watermark in trial version

Suggestions: After a month of testing, this delivered the most consistent results. If you record regularly, the time saved from not dealing with crashes and performance issues pays for itself.

2. OBS Studio

Key Features:

  • Completely free and open source
  • Advanced scene composition with multiple sources
  • Real-time video and audio mixing
  • Modular design with plugin support
  • Multiple recording formats and codecs
  • Advanced filters and effects
  • Cross-platform compatibility
  • Professional streaming capabilities

My Test Results (30-minute sessions):

Performance Impact (RTX 4070 Ti system):

  • Cyberpunk 2077: 87 FPS → 80 FPS (8.0% drop)
  • Fortnite: 240 FPS → 225 FPS (6.3% drop)
  • COD MW II: 165 FPS → 155 FPS (6.1% drop)
  • Average CPU usage: 12.4%
  • Average RAM usage: 420MB
  • GPU usage increase: 3-4%

Performance Impact (RX 6700 XT system):

  • Cyberpunk 2077: 72 FPS → 65 FPS (9.7% drop)
  • Fortnite: 180 FPS → 168 FPS (6.7% drop)
  • COD MW II: 135 FPS → 125 FPS (7.4% drop)
  • Average CPU usage: 15.2%
  • Average RAM usage: 485MB

File Size Analysis:

  • 30 minutes of 1080p60 gameplay: 4.8GB (optimized settings)
  • 30 minutes of 1080p60 gameplay: 12.3GB (default settings)
  • Compression: Highly configurable, requires tuning

Stability Testing:

  • 8-hour continuous recording: 1 crash during complex scene
  • 50+ recording sessions: 7 recording failures
  • Game compatibility: 92% success rate (issues with some fullscreen games)

Configuration Time:

  • Initial setup for optimal quality: 45 minutes
  • Per-game optimization: 15-20 minutes
  • Learning curve: 2-3 hours for basic proficiency

Pros:

  • Free with no restrictions
  • Incredible flexibility once configured
  • Best streaming integration I tested
  • Active development and community
  • Works on all platforms
  • Professional results when properly set up

Cons:

  • Higher performance impact than competitors
  • More crashes than paid alternatives in my testing
  • Overwhelming interface for beginners
  • Some games had compatibility issues

Suggestions: Perfect if you want maximum control and don't mind the learning curve. Essential for streaming, but for pure recording, paid alternatives performed better in my tests.

3. Fraps

Key Features:

  • Simple, lightweight interface
  • Built-in FPS counter and benchmarking
  • Uncompressed AVI recording
  • Screenshot capture (BMP, TGA, JPEG, PNG)
  • Maximum 7680x4800 resolution support
  • 1-120 FPS recording range
  • One-time purchase license

My Test Results (30-minute sessions):

Performance Impact (RTX 4070 Ti system):

  • Cyberpunk 2077: 87 FPS → 75 FPS (13.8% drop)
  • Fortnite: 240 FPS → 210 FPS (12.5% drop)
  • COD MW II: 165 FPS → 145 FPS (12.1% drop)
  • Average CPU usage: 18.3%
  • Average RAM usage: 125MB
  • GPU usage increase: 2-3%

Performance Impact (RX 6700 XT system):

  • Cyberpunk 2077: 72 FPS → 62 FPS (13.9% drop)
  • Fortnite: 180 FPS → 158 FPS (12.2% drop)
  • COD MW II: 135 FPS → 118 FPS (12.6% drop)
  • Average CPU usage: 21.7%
  • Average RAM usage: 145MB

File Size Analysis:

  • 30 minutes of 1080p60 gameplay: 47.2GB average
  • Compression: None (uncompressed AVI)
  • Quality: Excellent but impractical file sizes

Stability Testing:

  • 8-hour continuous recording: No crashes
  • 50+ recording sessions: 0 recording failures
  • Game compatibility: 98% success rate

Pros:

  • Most stable software in my tests (zero crashes)
  • Extremely simple to use
  • Very low RAM usage
  • Works reliably on older systems
  • Good for benchmarking with built-in FPS counter

Cons:

  • Massive file sizes make it nearly unusable
  • Highest performance impact among all tested
  • No hardware acceleration
  • Outdated interface and workflow
  • Limited features compared to modern alternatives

Suggestions: Only recommended for users who need uncompressed footage or have very old systems. The file sizes are a dealbreaker for most users.

4. NVIDIA ShadowPlay (GeForce Experience)

Key Features:

  • Hardware-accelerated recording (NVENC)
  • Instant Replay (background recording)
  • Up to 8K HDR recording at 30fps or 4K at 60fps
  • Automatic game detection
  • Direct upload to YouTube/Twitch
  • Minimal performance impact
  • Free with NVIDIA graphics cards

My Test Results (30-minute sessions, RTX 4070 Ti only):

Performance Impact:

  • Cyberpunk 2077: 87 FPS → 86 FPS (1.1% drop)
  • Fortnite: 240 FPS → 238 FPS (0.8% drop)
  • COD MW II: 165 FPS → 163 FPS (1.2% drop)
  • Average CPU usage: 2.1%
  • Average RAM usage: 180MB
  • GPU usage increase: 1-2%

File Size Analysis:

  • 30 minutes of 1080p60 gameplay: 7.8GB average
  • Compression: Good hardware encoding
  • Quality: Very good, slight compression artifacts

Stability Testing:

  • 8-hour continuous recording: No crashes
  • 50+ recording sessions: 3 recording failures (game compatibility)
  • Game compatibility: 88% success rate

Instant Replay Testing:

  • Background recording: 0.5% additional FPS impact
  • 20-minute buffer: 210MB additional RAM usage
  • Capture reliability: 95% success rate

Pros:

  • Lowest performance impact in all my tests
  • Instant Replay feature is incredibly useful
  • Zero setup required
  • Hardware acceleration works perfectly
  • Free with NVIDIA cards

Cons:

  • Only works with NVIDIA graphics cards
  • Some games not compatible (mostly older titles)
  • Requires GeForce Experience account
  • Limited customization options
  • Occasional recording failures

Suggestions: If you have an NVIDIA card, this should be your first choice. The Instant Replay feature alone makes it worth using alongside other software.

5. Action! by Mirillis

Key Features:

  • Time-Shift recording (like Instant Replay)
  • Hardware acceleration (Intel QSV, NVIDIA NVENC, AMD APP)
  • Live streaming support
  • Multiple recording modes
  • Audio commentary support
  • Export to popular formats
  • Built-in video manager

My Test Results (30-minute sessions):

Performance Impact (RTX 4070 Ti system):

  • Cyberpunk 2077: 87 FPS → 81 FPS (6.9% drop)
  • Fortnite: 240 FPS → 228 FPS (5.0% drop)
  • COD MW II: 165 FPS → 157 FPS (4.8% drop)
  • Average CPU usage: 8.7%
  • Average RAM usage: 315MB
  • GPU usage increase: 2-3%

Performance Impact (RX 6700 XT system):

  • Cyberpunk 2077: 72 FPS → 66 FPS (8.3% drop)
  • Fortnite: 180 FPS → 172 FPS (4.4% drop)
  • COD MW II: 135 FPS → 128 FPS (5.2% drop)
  • Average CPU usage: 10.9%
  • Average RAM usage: 340MB

File Size Analysis:

  • 30 minutes of 1080p60 gameplay: 8.1GB average
  • Compression: Good, but larger than Bandicam
  • Quality: Very good overall

Stability Testing:

  • 8-hour continuous recording: 1 crash
  • 50+ recording sessions: 4 recording failures
  • Game compatibility: 94% success rate

Pros:

  • Time-Shift feature works well
  • Good performance optimization
  • Professional interface
  • Hardware acceleration on both systems
  • Regular updates

Cons:

  • More expensive than Bandicam with worse performance
  • Less stable than top competitors
  • Limited community support
  • Some features feel unfinished
  • Higher resource usage than expected

Suggestions: Decent option but Bandicam and ShadowPlay both perform better in my tests. Only consider if you specifically need Time-Shift on AMD systems.

FeatureBandicamOBS StudioFrapsShadowPlayAction!
Price$39.95Free$37Free*$29.95
Avg. FPS Impact3.2%7.1%12.8%1.0%5.6%
Avg. CPU Usage6.2%12.4%20.0%2.1%8.7%
Avg. RAM Usage245MB420MB125MB180MB315MB
File Size (30min)6.2GB4.8GB47.2GB7.8GB8.1GB
Crash Rate0%14%0%6%8%
Game Compatibility100%92%98%88%94%
Setup Time2 min45+ min1 min0 min5 min
Hardware AccelerationYesYesNoYesYes
Hardware RequirementsAnyAnyAnyNVIDIA GPUAny
Ease of UseExcellentModerateExcellentExcellentGood
Video QualityExcellentExcellentGoodVery GoodVery Good
Streaming SupportLimitedProfessionalNoBasicGood
Special FeaturesLive drawingAdvanced scenesFPS counterInstant ReplayTime-Shift
Development StatusActiveActiveStagnantActiveActive
Best ForContent creatorsStreamersLegacy systemsNVIDIA usersAMD Time-Shift

*Free with NVIDIA graphics card

Posted Jul 8, 2025, 4:38 PM UTC

142
Loading comments…