Question.

Logically. A clash between an unstoppable sword versus an impenetrable shield would be a tie and they’d forever in the clash. But wouldn’t that mean that the unstoppable sword fails to pierce everything?

An unstoppable sword being forever in a clash against a shield means that the sword will forever be inable to pierce the shield. But a claim saying the shield can stop any weapon still remains intact. I don’t know if I’m right here but I want to know if this is valid