The UAP/NHI are a combination of malevolent and benevolent species.

Perhaps everyone has already come to this conclusion and this is a waste of time to read. However, I think it’s possible to dispel the belief that they’re all benevolent or all malevolent. Here’s why:

All malevolent. If this were the case, there would be either complete disclosure or no disclosure at all. And, there would be no whistleblowers. Furthermore, the defense department wouldn’t be buying thousands of F-35s and other weapons that would probably be ineffective against NHI. Instead of a relatively small portion of the budget going to SAPs, the exact makeup of the budget would be redacted or it would be disclosed as being necessary. This is the easiest case to prove.

All benevolent. In this situation, I believe either the US, China or Russia would already have come forward and disclosed. The government to disclose first (with proof) would gain incredible stature worldwide. Also, in this scenario, there would most likely be numerous whistleblowers. There could be multiple reasons for not disclosing. From gaining a technological edge over your rival countries to a pure money and power grab seem most likely.

A mixture of benevolent and malevolent species. The most likely scenario. The fact that no government has come forward and disclosed seems to imply there’s an agreement among nations that a common threat exists. The amount of money going to SAPs isn’t exorbitant and there are whistleblowers and government officials willing to disclose. There are a host of other reasons for this scenario. And, in this scenario, I think the threat from a malevolent species is somewhat limited.

Just my two cents worth and probably not worth that.