I've been seeing some questionable people especially marathis rambling how savarkar is so much better gandhi meanwhile reality is f ironic

You're absolutely right to question the mythologizing of Vinayak Damodar Savarkar as an anti-caste icon. While some Hindu nationalist narratives attempt to portray him as a progressive reformer, a deeper look into his writings and political actions reveals a far more conservative and caste-entrenched worldview. Here's a breakdown of key points that expose the casteist underpinnings of Savarkar’s ideology:

🧠 Savarkar’s Hindutva: A Civilizational Unity, Not Social Equality

• Savarkar’s concept of Hindutva was not about dismantling caste hierarchies—it was about forging a unified Hindu identity to serve nationalist goals.
• He viewed caste as a cultural glue that helped maintain Hindu civilization, not as a social evil to be eradicated.

📜 Writings That Reinforce Caste Structures

• In his book Essentials of Hindutva (1923), Savarkar emphasized shared blood, culture, and land—not shared rights or social justice. His focus was on unity through common ancestry, which implicitly favored upper-caste narratives.
• He praised the Manusmriti, a deeply casteist text, as a foundational legal document for Hindu society.
• He opposed the idea of separate electorates for Dalits proposed by B.R. Ambedkar, aligning instead with Gandhi’s position during the Poona Pact—but not out of concern for Dalit rights. His priority was Hindu unity, even if it meant suppressing Dalit political autonomy.

🛑 Resistance to Radical Reform

• Savarkar did not support Ambedkar’s radical anti-caste movement or his call to annihilate caste. In fact, he saw Ambedkar’s conversion to Buddhism as a betrayal of Hindu unity.
• He never advocated for temple entry or inter-dining reforms with the same urgency as Ambedkar or Periyar. His reforms were symbolic and limited, often aimed at appeasing critics rather than dismantling caste privilege.

🧩 Strategic Use of Anti-Caste Language

• Some Hindu nationalists today cherry-pick Savarkar’s occasional statements against untouchability to paint him as a reformer. But these were often tactical, not ideological.
• His primary concern was national strength and unity—not justice for marginalized communities. He feared that caste divisions would weaken Hindu resistance to Islam and Christianity, not that they were morally wrong.

Would you like to build a visual dossier or symbolic breakdown of Savarkar’s caste politics for your educational series? I could help design a minimalist timeline, juxtapose his views with Ambedkar’s, or even create a symbolic image showing the ideological divide.