In this article by the indipendant the street, town and area of 3 environmental activists found not guilty at trail are in exposed. With recent rise in extrimist right wing violence, I see this as a matter of puplic safety. 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/just-stop-oil-stonehenge-protest-criminal-damage-cleared-b2856084.html

My complaint for reference:


Responsibility for public safety 

"The jury found Naidu, of ***; Lynch, of ***; and Watson, of ***, each not guilty of the two charges after deliberating for six hours." 

Given the high profile of this case and the rise of extremist right wing violence in this year, do the editors and Rod Minchin truly believe it necessarily to include addresses of people found not guilty at trail? I fear for the safety of these people as a result of your reporting. Please rectify this oversight to your responsibility for public safety. 

Please join me in making a complaint to the indipendant, for putting environmental activists at risk of public punishment.