Breeding clinic (M4F)

Kinks: Blackmail, impregnating, fucking in the ass, slapping, interfaith.

As you know that indian society is very old fashioned/conservative, because of that if a woman can't get pregnant in a household, she gets the blame even tho 99% of the time its the man's fault, and the husband and wife know that and even the entire family, but they still blame the woman, because of the "society" not fair right, but it's the reality and you can't change the reality in a day, but the problem of woman not getting pregnant is a very big problem and almost 20% percent of the wife aren't pregnant because of their loser husband.

So here we are with a solution, our kink breeding clinic is a clinic that helps those woman's in need who wants to get pregnant, and for that we have the best male for that for breeding those woman, but the demand is very high and we have only 2 man right now and they are very picky and they never chose fat,ugly women, they always want big boobs, big ass, and sexy women but that's not a problem because there are many women like that who cames to us, But everything is not perfect, because sometime this man loves a woman to much and then they blackmail this womans if they like them to much, or just keep fucking them and impregnating them multiple times or some times they found that this wife's have cuck husband so I am fucking their wifes infront of them, and 80% percent of this wife's are muslim women because muslim man are much more cucks and have small penis..

Leave it Pleasure presents as good and attractive – itself, when it comes to our notice, and all else that appears aglow in its light. This suggests simple explanations both of why people pursue pleasure and why there are reasons to do so. That we may prefer and choose something for its pleasure suggests that there are facts about pleasure that make some such choices better than others. Philosophers, taking this suggestion further, have sometimes taken pleasure to be a single simple (feature of) experience that makes experiences good and attractive to the extent it is present. This simple picture has often been associated with more sweeping normative and psychological claims, all ambiguously called “hedonism”. These take pleasure’s goodness and attractiveness (and pain’s badness and aversiveness) to (between them) explain all of human value, normative practical reasons, and motivation. Pleasure and pain would, if views of all three kinds were true, be the only ultimately good- and bad-making features of human (and relevantly similar animal) life and also both the only actual ultimate ends and the only justified ultimate ends of all our voluntary pursuit and avoidance. The simple picture and related hedonistic claims and explanations were especially prominent in the psychology, economics, and philosophy of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries but were widely rejected in the twentieth.

Contemporary science partly restores pleasure’s importance but also suggests that pleasure’s relations to awareness and motivational attraction are more variable than many hedonists and much ordinary thinking supposed. Contemporary philosophers continue to debate what pleasure is but are only beginning to address scientific advances that are slowly filling out what age-old use of psychoactive substances to enhance mood and newer drug therapies for depression already presupposed – pleasure is a biological phenomenon