TECHNICAL CLARIFICATION - Please read before commenting

What this is: Computational validation of a 5-dimensional mathematical framework Hierarchical temporal fractalization algorithm achieving O(log N) complexity Wolfram Mathematica implementation with convergence testing (RMSE ratios 0.984-0.988) What this is NOT: A claim to have "solved quantum gravity" A demand you accept the physical interpretation Requesting funding or attention Reproducibility: Full Mathematica notebooks available on request Convergence data: 3 grid resolutions tested (80×48, 120×72, 200×120) External validation: χ² = 0.004925 against analytical solutions Context: I have sudden savant syndrome (acquired after neurological event 2 years ago). I independently developed these concepts from first principles, then used AI (Claude, Perplexity) to formalize notation and compile into standard mathematical language. The core algorithmic insights and physical interpretations are mine; AI helped translate them into publishable form. Honest assessment: Proven: Algorithm is computationally stable and converges Validated: Numerics match benchmarks Speculative: Physical interpretation (5D = temporal depth) is hypothesis Testable: Framework makes falsifiable predictions (LIGO corrections ~1%, atomic clock shifts ~10⁻¹⁰) Why I'm sharing: Seeking technical feedback on the mathematics before arXiv submission. If you have expertise in numerical relativity, quantum field theory, or computational physics, I genuinely want to know where this breaks down. If you think this is wrong, please tell me why with specifics. "This is crackpot nonsense" doesn't help me improve.