If you're still defending Trump regarding Epstein at this point, you are concerning
It seems that the most charitable characterization we can make for Donald Trump and his relationship to Jeffrey Epstein, is that he only knew that Jeffrey Epstein was guilty of sleeping with minors and didn't do anything to report this, and also, the girls were probably 15, so that's all good.
First of all, if you have to launch into the "technically, there is a difference between p*dophilia and eph*bephilia” argument, you're already a very strange creature. Hard to believe Megyn Kelly went there on national television her own volition.
But here we are -- the goal posts have been shifted to "even if Trump knew about Epstein's horrible misdeeds and didn't tell the police or feds and help these young girls, at least they weren't seven!"
I would not allow anybody defending Trump at this point near children -- and yes, that means anyone under 18. Cause... Jesus Christ.
(And before anyone whines, I'm only using asterisks because I don't fully know the sub rules on real words. I wish we could use our big-boy language too and talk about what Donald Trump really is!)
Posted Nov 14, 2025, 1:50 PM UTC