Marked as spoiler just in case.
I just got my hands on my copy about two weeks ago and have been reading it in preparation for a campaign. There are certain passages, wordings, and formatting choices (or maybe mistakes?) that I'm having trouble figuring out.

The first such is on page 182, in the Disadvantages section. It's the Disadvantage called Oathbound. It seems... opposite of how it sounds to me. It seems to me like a vow of chastity would make it easier to avoid seduction, not harder. Oaths in general are supposed to facilitate a certain behavior, not punish it. There are consequences for breaking an oath, sure, but I don't understand the penalty for merely being in the presence of a taboo.

The next is on page 223, in the Metamorphose for the Blue Character section. It says the Aide-de-Camp has the same statistics as the Squire, just with doubled bonuses. As far as I can tell the Squire isn't listed anywhere in the book, but the Aide-de-Camp is. Based on the Steed option for the Gray character's Awakening Metamorphose, I think this might just be a typo of sorts, but it is confusing.

The next is on page 225, in the Awakening section of the Metamorphose for the Red Character. Every other Metamorphose has two distinct options denoted by a red line between them and a change in font. The first option is always Specialization, the second option is called different things for each Color. The Red Character doesn't have this. Again, I think thisight just be a typo or formatting error, but I want to get other people's input. 

Lastly (for now) there's a passage on page 147, in the description of Vision 2: The Throne of Kamelot. It says "...the Guardians found the Grail, restored the dispersed Order of the Round Table, and pushed on to Tuathan, the domain of the Fore-dwellers. There, they opposed Arthur and kept Excalibur in it's prison, dealing a decisive blow to the Fore-dweller empire." 
I thought Arthur died/disappeared immediately after creating the Guardians through the use of magic? It mentions that earlier in the book, but now it claims the Guardians actually opposed him. And why would Arthur want to remove Excalibur from it's "prison" if that would somehow aid the Fore-dwellers?

I thought to get more information on the lore of the Fall of Avalon from the wiki, but it's not very helpful at all. 

Any and all advice, info, or thoughts are welcome, and thank you in advance!

Help deciphering Corebook