PRINCE ARMING Harry wins Govt review into demand for armed cops when he visits UK paving way for reunion between King & grandkids

https://www.thesun.co.uk/royals/37562017/prince-harry-armed-police-security-kids-king-charles/?utm_source=sharebar_app&utm_medium=sharebar_app&utm_campaign=sharebar_app_article

https://archive.is/6Pufd

The Sun can reveal the Home Office has now ordered a threat assessment for the first time since Harry stepped down as a working royal in 2020.

The Royal and VIP Executive Committee (Ravec) has now instructed its Risk Management Board to reassess his threat level for the first time in nearly six years.

It is understood the process is already under way, with evidence taken from police, government and Harry’s team.

A decision is expected next month from the government body, which is overseen by the Home Office.

If it rules he requires armed protection then taxpayers would pay for it whenever he is in the UK.

Let's see.

Five years have passed since 2020. Therefore, this review was already necessary. Now, what did Harry gain? He gained nothing. Harry's attempt to complain to Ravec doesn't mean at all that he got what he demanded. He demanded that Ravec make him the SuperUltraVIP, as important as Trump, more important than KC3. And four judges already told him, "Dude, stop smoking that weed."

So Harry hasn't gained anything. Because let's never forget what Harry wants: he wants his security paid for wherever he is in the world, the security he currently has to pay for out of his own pocket. And Ravec won't do it, the UK government won't do it, and KC3 won't do it. And given that Harry won't be setting foot in the UK with his children because his wife doesn't want that to happen, and given that it's clear he has no family to visit, what has Harry gained?

Don't forget one thing: Harry doesn't want Ravec to listen to him, he wants Ravec to do what he wants. And the reality is that if he was already at the level of a regular VIP, after everything he's done and still not paying his debt to the government, why would they upgrade him?

If Starmer did that, if Starmer gave him the protection Harry craves, do you realize where that would leave him? Starmer questions what Andrew paid for Royal Lodge and what the royals pay for their homes... but giving Harry taxpayer-funded armed security, if he wants it, for Harry?