The moonlanding.
As i research many things, there are 2 big questions that are coming up, when they say they have been to the moon in the 60s and the technology that they used. There are many inconsistencies but these are the 2 main arguments that cant be answered by nasa.
In our solar system there are only a few planets with a magnetic field. Mercury, the gas giants and earth. Mars once also had one but now it got destroyed over time. If any spacecraft is in the radius above earth its is also shielded by those protective layers of the magnetic field. Space is a place of high radiation in different strengh. For example our sun emits a energy of 3.8 × 10²⁶ watts. If you travel now outside of this field, to the moon, you are exposed to all kinds of radiation. Thats not the biggest problem thou. The radiation is extremly high at the outer lines of the magnetic field. There are specific times and points to cross it, and the how they did it with this kind of spacecraft, for those humans to survive, is physicaly and scientificly impossible. Because what was the protection for the astronauts in the apollo spacecraft against radiation. Correct zero. No explenation!
The phonecall.
While they went to the moon, they had a life feed of the landing. They also set up a phonecall to the moon on live televison. Also that kind of technology was not revealed and explained how it was possible to have this live feed.
Nixon using a green telephone with a dial.
Thats the best explanation i heard for that.
It was not a “dial up” phone call. What they did would be known as a “phone patch” - The phone line is split into the transmit (microphone) and receive (earphone) sides electronically. Then, the transmit side audio is “patched” into the uplink for voice (using what was called USB - Unified S-band). Similarly, the downlink signal from Apollo 11 was patched into the phone line heading back to the president.
Similar systems were used with shortwave radio to make international calls. If you heard reporting from London during WW 2, it was likely carried via a similar method. During the Korean and VietNam wars, amateur radio operators would do phone patches from families and friends to soldiers serving overseas. Doing phone patches has sort of died out since the 1980s because of two things: cell phones and incredibly cheap international calling rates. I think I did my last radio/phone contact in the early 90s, and that was on a VHF repeater from my handi-talkie, to the repeater, then onto the phone lines to the sheriff’s department.
But it is very hard to do over that long distance with the magnetic field and the cosmic rays to have such a stable connection. Not even talking about the camera feed, thats a whole different story.
Its a fact the the data for the tv live feed came from 3 observatories. They each had a 64m parabolic antenna. The signal was mixed in with different data.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fernseh%C3%BCbertragung_der_Mondlandung_1969
The Apollo television broadcasts (from Apollo 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17) all transmitted bespoke, low-resolution signals over 20-watt transmitters that emitted through the antennas between 10 and 12 watts of signal power, directed toward Earth using either
- A large, umbrella-type folding parabolic antenna on the lunar surface
- A similar antenna mounted on a rover
- A much smaller parabolic antenna on the Luner Module.
- A set of four similar small antennas on the Service Module.
If you’re thinking that 20 watts isn’t much to send a TV signal over a quarter of a million miles, you’re right. That’s why it was received mostly using huge parabolic receivers (radio telescopes) at Goldstone California (64 meters or 210 feet diameter), and in Australia (the largest being 64 meters or 210 feet).
These enormous antennas collected the faint signal and concentrated it, then amplified it using equipment so powerful, that it had to be cryogenically cooled to reduce thermal noise in the electronics.
Conversely, when audio and data signals were sent up to the spacecraft, these same large antennas (and numerous not quite-so-large ones around the world) sent powerful broadcasts out so that the puny receivers on the spacecraft could pick them up.
Thats what it is needed for the signal to be transmitted. Inclouding a special camera. All those are questions that had to be answered from nasa overtime. Thru statements and writings.
https://www.howtogeek.com/how-nasa-broadcast-the-first-live-video-from-the-moon/
The signal would be much stronger and better if it came from orbit thou
FAKE NASA !! Whats strange if we look at nasa offical stuff, we often find signs of fraud or faking. So however one thing is clear. Something strange going on.
The challenger hoax
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TdYOqvd-UbY&list=PLvDjfwfZmdl0xCqXWUhayCn373vd_L82o
The international fake station
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmj_SdBURX0
Is it even possible to leave earth orbit? These are all questions we have to ask.
This is for entertainment only. have fun with the mysterous and beautiful. As you know what the truth is? The moon is a spacestation where they recycle the souls. Just kidding. Aint no soulcube ever fotographed.
Oh wait they found it. Here it is!
Posted Feb 15, 2026, 3:54 PM UTC