How come really bad chapters are constantly voted as a 4/5 out of 5?
In the comments the last chapter was universally panned as mid/bad.
Nothing happened. Something that could have been done in 3-4 pages was dragged out for 13-14.
Hillarious Sommers was the only good thing.
Yet most people who voted gave the chapter a 5/5. At BEST this chapter was a 3/5.
When looking through other chapters the results are the same.
Dogshit chapters get panned in the comments - but most people vote them as a 4/5 out of 5.
How can this be?
Posted Feb 16, 2026, 8:25 PM UTC
418