I built userp.ly — a tool that analyzes any webpage to check if its content is actually as fresh as it claims.

I built userp.ly. You copy a URL, open the app, it detects the link from your clipboard and analyzes the page in one tap.

The main thing it does: pulls dates from 17 different sources on any webpage and scores how trustworthy each one is. JSON-LD, Open Graph, HTTP headers, Schema.org, timestamps buried in the HTML — all of it. Turns out a lot of "recently updated" content hasn't actually changed in years.

It also does SEO scoring, freshness categorization, and feeds every scan into a community archive so you can see trends across the internet.

Free tier gives you 3 scans a day. Pro is $4.99/mo with a 7-day trial. Early users who try it before the native App Store launch get lifetime Pro free.

Live now at userply.pro — works in the browser and through Expo Go on mobile. Solo project.

The pain point i am trying to rectify with, if its not obvious, is result pages are displayed suggestively as "most clicked on must be most believable and/or current"

Although i wont be able to make everything you read on the internet true, at least it will offer a much needed chronological way to look at it.

Constructive criticism i what i could use if anyone is compelled to give it.