Is there any kind of philosophical consensus on what it means for something to be real?

I was thinking about mereology, and whether objects like tables are "real". I don't think they are, but there is obviously a sense in which they are. Obviously, words can have multiple definitions, and can mean different things in different contexts. I'm a mereological nihilist, but I still think my car is real in the colloquial sense.

What I'm curious about is whether "real" means something particular in philosophy, or if the meaning is always context dependent.