I fine-tuned Qwen 14B to beat GPT-4o on NYT Connections (30% vs 22.7%)
I spent a weekend fine-tuning Qwen 2.5 14B to solve NYT Connections puzzles. Results:
| Model | Solve Rate |
|---|---|
| Base Qwen 14B | 9.3% |
| GPT-4o-mini | 10.0% |
| GPT-4o | 22.7% |
| My fine-tuned model | 30.0% |
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 (teacher) | 87.3% |
What worked: Distillation. I had Sonnet solve ~350 puzzles while explaining its reasoning step-by-step, then fine-tuned Qwen on those traces. The model learned to think about the puzzle, not just output answers.
What didn't work:
- Fine-tuning on just puzzle solutions (learned format, not reasoning)
- Synthetic puzzle generation (Sonnet kept making trivial puzzles)
- Embedding similarity scoring (word associations aren't semantic)
Setup:
- QLoRA with Unsloth
- LoRA rank 32, 2.5 epochs
- ~20 min training on A100
- Total cost: ~$10
Full writeup with code: https://open.substack.com/pub/john463212/p/teaching-a-14b-oss-model-to-beat
Happy to answer questions about the approach!
Posted Feb 26, 2026, 2:02 PM UTC
1113