77.3 just a chat about the political climate. That's probably to deep. (Prompt only)

💥

When I said red herring and tone policing and origin fallacy. Is after I tried to figure out a fallicy after they shifted the goal post. As you can see the labels are right under the comment I'm talking about. It is their inability to see how they talk is why they asked me to explain. And it is their inability to understandy explanation is why they can attribute me bad faith. They do not take what I say seriously enough to think about it to see any truth in it, because they stick to only their perspective and they do not activate their prefrontal cortex to talk to me. That is what the say something deep is about. They admit by accident that they find it unnecessary to activate their prefrontal cortex

💥

Alright I deleted a lot of my messages. This is what remains. After he said:

Person shameless

Alright, good luck finding the fallacy buddy! It will be 2-3 hours from now when I check back

Person 69

https://www.reddit.com/r/Destiny/s/TWq3bFs7QO

Trump closed the border almost immediately. Did he need bidens bill to do it.

Why was 10+ million people able to get in when Biden came into power

This is such an a ridiculous take. It's like you never steelmanned someones argument before

Person 69

You rely on news and sources but you lack a philosophical foundation, to interpret them well. That is why you can't add anything to what I am saying in my posts. You don't ponder 🤔, you fact check, for narritive clarity

Let's agree to disagree. Because I already know your response. You will act like I proved nothing and you will not say anything deep

Shifting the goal post

You miss understand how people change their minds. It was never my job to do so. It was yours. But you refuse to give yourself the opportunity

You are the arbitrary of what you think is correct of what I am saying. That is true. But even if I say something true that doesn't mean you will see it as truth if you believe a lie already.

When I said red herring and tone policing and origin fallacy. Was after I tried to figure out a fallicy after they shifted the goal post. As you can see the labels are right under the comment I'm talking about. So the example and the words are right there already but you want formal fallicies instead.

It is your inability to see how you talk. That is why you asked me to explain.

And it is your inability to understand my explanation. That is why you can attribute wrongness to it.

You do not take what I say seriously enough to think about. So you never find any truth in it it to. There is a kernel of truth in everything. You know what you believe that is your perspective. you do not activate your prefrontal cortex to talk to me. If you did you would take longer to respond and you would have said something creative and not rehearsed.

Look at what you said after I ask you to say something deep. You admited by accident that you find it unnecessary to activate their prefrontal cortex.