True or False? SwamiNarayan name is commonly used in North India for Lord Narayan, not for Ghanshyam Pande AKA Sahajanand Swami. The name is a compound of two words in Hindi or Sanskrit: "Swami" (meaning "master" or "lord") and "Narayan" (a form of Lord Vishnu, the preserver in the Hindu Trimurti).
He was named Ghanshyam Pandeji in his childhood, was born on Monday , 3 April 1781, 9th Chaitra Sud of Samvat 1837, at 10:10 PM in the village of Chhapaiya near Ayodhya to his father Hariprasad Pandey (also known as Dharmadev) and mother Premvati (also known as Bhakitamata or Murtidevi)
Just Curious, "10:10 PM"?, which clock/watch did they use in remote village of Uttar Pradesh for precise or accurate time in 1781 AD? FYI: Mass production of clocks and watches began in the 1850s AD in the United States, driven by innovations like the use of interchangeable parts and the development of factory-based work systems. Mass-produced Indian-made watch were HMT in 1963 and TITAN in 1980s.
Coincidentally, that day he was born also Ram Navami. Therefore, this day is also celebrated as Swaminarayan Jayanti by the people of the Swaminarayan sect.
Coincidentally, Ghanshyam Pandeji's parents "Also Known As Names" are the same name of Nar-Narayan Dev's parents, Dharma (father) and Murti (mother). Dharma, Murti, and Bhakti are all intimately associated with Nar-Narayan, twin sages and partial incarnations of the preserver deity Vishnu/Narayan. The relationship is rooted in their lineage, purpose, and symbolism.
Coincidentally, Other Names or "Also Known as Names = Deceptive names" for Ghanshyam Pandeji are related to Lord Narayan and Lord Shiva, example Swaminarayan, Sahajanand , Shreeji, Hari krishna, Narayan Muni, Neelkanth Varni, Ghanshyam, etc.
Coincidentally, everyone started calling Ghanshyam Pandeji as "SwamiNarayan" The name is a compound of two words in Hindi or Sanskrit: "Swami" (meaning "master" or "lord") and "Narayan" (a form of Lord Vishnu, the preserver in the Hindu Trimurti). The name "SwamiNarayan" is commonly used in North India for Lord Narayan, not for Ghanshyam Pande AKA Sahajanand Swami.
Coincidentally, Someone labeled or named him "Shri Swaminarayan Bhagwan"
Coincidentally, Akshar-Purushottam concept they are trying to market is somewhat or somehow related to the concept of Lord Nar-Narayan of Badrinath the reincarnation of Lord Narayan. NAR is the ideal devotee of God or Human Soul, and NARAYAN is the Divine or supreme God.
Coincidentally, in 1802 AD, Santdas goes into Samadhi and ends up into Akshardham and see Ghanshyam Pandeji seated on a divine throne. Ramanand Swami serving and praying to Pandeji, and many gods and avatars such as Lord Shiv, and Lord Brahma and other on one leg worshiping Pandeji. Then Ramanand asked him "Why does Muktanand Swami not believe?" etc... ha ha ha "Why was this is first and only question?" Ramanand's first question to Santdas should have been, "When did you die? or What are you doing here? isn't it?" Just Curious, What did Muktanand Swami not believe in?
Coincidentally, Muktanand Swami never believed in Ghanshyam Pandeji? He only believed in Lord Narayan?
Coincidentally, someone started removing ShivLings "Real Nilkanth' from their temples used for Abhisheks, and replaced them by "Fake Nilkanth"
Coincidentally, someone placed deceptive mural of Ghanshyam Pandeji and Lord Hanumanji under the King of Salangpur Statue, that they had to remove later.
Coincidentally, someone drew a photo of Lord Shiv and Mata Parvati, in the service of Ghanshyam Pandeji.
Coincidentally, Ghanshyam Pandeji met with Reginald Heber, the Lord Bishop of Calcutta in 1825 AD, and when the Bishop asked Pandeji which God does he worships he truly replied Krishna of ancient times.
Coincidentally, Ghanshyam Pandeji build all six temples for his Lord Narayan, Shree Krishna, Radhaji and Laxmiji.
Coincidentally, in Shikshapatri Verse 1, Ghanshyam Pandeji meditates to Lord Krishna, Radhaji and Laxmiji, in Verse 108 he says Lord Krishna is Supreme, and in Verse 121 he says Goloka Dham is the godly abode dear to him.
Coincidentally, Ghanshyam Pandeji wrote "Desh Vibhag No Lekh" and transferred all that he inherited for free from Ramanand Swami to his family members, otherwise he did not believed in MOH and MAYA.
Coincidentally, Ghanshyam Pandeji started labeling others as Kusangi and Chaandaal for not obeying his commands in "Desh Vibhag No Lekh" and cursing them even after death for not following his command "Should one, failing this seek refuge in another and honor him, his soul shall never have happiness in this world or in the world to come but shall suffer extreme pains."
Coincidentally, Some people also started calling him "Fake Narayan" and "Fake Nilkanth"
Deciding whether something is a coincidence or has an intention behind it often comes down to a person's perspective, beliefs, and the context of the events. and how the deception is created and marketed.
Coincidentally, someone published a book called ChhalKapat: The Deception on Swaminarayan Sampraday.
Coincidentally, after watching the above movie someone got idea of labeling Ghanshyam Pandeji as Shri Hari too?
Coincidentally, most of these labels or names given to Ghanshyam Pandeji are related to Lord Narayan and recently, Neelkanth to Lord Shiva, and in process of renaming him as "Shri Hari" too, as stated above. Shri Hari means, 'the one who takes away the sorrow and pain of all'. Shri Hari is a name of Lord Vishnu or Lord Narayan. The name can be broken down: "Shri" is a title of respect meaning "auspicious" or "fortunate," while "Hari" means "remover of sins" or "he who takes away" sorrows, obstacles, and darkness.
My question is who keeps giving so many deceptive labels or names to Ghanshyam Pandeji and his parents?
Can someone take them to court for intentionally using Hindu God's names and labels for Ghanshyam Pandeji and his parents, and deceiving masses by creating fake stories, photos, murals, and hurting sentiments of billions of Hindus worldwide? If a coincident, I please request them to stop using fake/deceptive photos, stories, and names.
Can there be so many coincident?
Sometimes I wonder, is this all happening because of coincident or intention?
I wish, the fake and deceptive intentions of few cunning and deceptive Swami's if any, are exposed by "DivyaChakshu" AKA The Internet.
If Hindus taught their kids about TriMurti/TriDev, Lord Narayan and his avatars, Bhakt Prahalad and Narad Muni etc. at home, none would dare to deceive them. Individuals who pose as spiritual leaders, or "gurus," often deceive followers through a pattern of manipulation, exploitation, and psychological control. This cycle is rooted in a charismatic but deceptive persona that preys on people's vulnerabilities by offering a sense of purpose and belonging.
My question is, How do you ensure that you won't be deceived?
जय स्वामी नारायण
"नारायण, नारायण"
Posted Mar 6, 2026, 4:02 AM UTC