Non-English-Proficient Tenants

Hi! Landlords - are you less likely to rent to someone who has little to no English proficiency, or does that not apply to you? Do you make an effort to translate documents and leases (does this come from a fear of litigation or being accused of discrimination)? Considering that in the Bay Area, a lot of people do not speak English at home, and plenty of people are not proficient in English, would not renting to non-English-proficient tenants make it harder for you to find a candidate? Does the location of being in the Bay Area (diverse populations) affect landlords' attitudes on renting to tenants who are not proficient in English?

For context, I'm asking this because I am a high school student working on an initiative to pass a law in Fremont that requires rent-related documents to be translated for non-English proficient tenants, and I'm curious about the landlord perspective on the topic. It's called "Not Just English Rent", and it's in a very preliminary stage right now, but if you're interested I'd encourage you to check out this post: https://www.instagram.com/p/DVfo58\_FLKD/?utm\_source=ig\_web\_copy\_link&igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==.

And now, for the big question: if large corporate landlords (big residential companies with large monthly revenues) ONLY were subjected to translating rent-related documents, would that make you more open to supporting the translation of rent-related documents for tenants? Or do you think such a proposal would still scare away smaller landlords because of financial burdens, paperwork, and difficulty with translation?