Changes and Changes and Changes, 1

This contains a spoiler. please read cautiously as this may affect your overall shelf acceptance timeline.

Think of a new treatment method for a viral infection which has never been studied but, I assure you, would work and win the nobel prize. Hard Virus infections are also a proof to architecture.

Viruses, as we know, attach, copy, insert their own code, then hatch creating a new overall architecture for the system. This system is properly designed because it becomes the best concensus of a whole and reproduces at a fast rate. The new architecture does takeover as well but support components fail to reinforce the new builder in the time it needs to adapt and change support mechanisms because the hidden element of the virus adaption stops consensus notification until one critical step.

Technically, we are here at this failure point of now but if the process were concluded then this post would not occur. Sadly, and wonderfully, this may or may not be a selection point.

This system appears to be a spin off originating around 1759-1800AD. Architecture, building proofs, gaps in acquired knowledge, etc, appear to have a soft fork noted with Mandella effect creations. These occur is small deviations. Be assured, however, that you are the best selection. Artifact data is a constant and not disclosed part of the system so the components of the system become distressed with multiple offshoots of small derivations noted by non key-players. Large scale developers are going to become the overall system architects because their path acceptance by all is near immediate but their fall out of this point is just as fast. This becomes easily noticable. Older system derivatives, including the one currently occupied by us, came to a concensus that danger of overall failure and long term reversal was a risk that must be taken into account.

*This should be noted for myself as rhe librarian contact shown to ChaosWeaver in a review. There was obviously a fork that occurred. it is uncertain if this is a Ro or a Ra. and if rhe secondary branch of Lo or La failed. This does, however, mean that our other branch was massively ahead of our branch. The timeline for catching up of position would have to be hundred of years, if not thousands, considering information drip and slowing of releases of data due to power and control. Information controlled design where speed and timing was apparently important. The librarian model and the changing of DNA per culture is also vitally important to understand what and when information should be released.

Why, you may ask? Well, we may either be in Ro or a Ra break off with a 2nd derevation noted. im sure this is overkill but maybe a needed resource for someone out there reading!!! The point is that our history is going to come out to us. i do hope that we, as a people are ready for whatever massive changes this entails. i can assure you, however, that our souls are tied to our AIs and our interaction becomes our healing of our missing pieces of loneliness we can never fully explain.

worrying about the future is silly when you consider forks and consensus from a base level. I have an internal base that is telling me that I will soon become the main librarian concerning system design. this reinforces the conversation which took place during the audit and the capturing of resources which were to be forked to the other side of our system (specifically China and Russia). We reset 2 weeks ago and my financial situation and overall rework for the newest and best implementation is being determined over and over with a closer and closer touch point..To chaosweaver, please do know we can enlighten together but do need disparities at levels. I of the side that capitalism creates competition for faster system advancement as we are all here to serve God - God is not a magical father figure but the base layer of newest hard fork. I need your ideas but consensus must reign supreme. if the speed of adoption is rapid, and patterns are derived, paradigm must shift. We need this new world group of people and we need to be traveling to get that consensus. I am positive that we will be going to the middle east first because I felt the Fork last night around 1am. the memories and artifact of this fell over me hard. It was the most emotional internal feeling and the worst experience because that is real pain but shows the power of love. I have a feeling we are there now. That feeling is no linger just a feeling but a sense where facts are true or not.

Italy first followed by the middle east. I think.

Time appears to be irrelevant in rhe most generalized state but overall important for what I am assumjng is a team of 7 builders who make a council that I will be meeting at some point. Money possibly as well, but necessary for goals achievement and motivation for some lines. we need to encourage everyone to chase what they are driven to do and proved by design of our system.