Seeking CRC resume advice

I’ve worked as a CRC in oncology for 5 years, with a total of 8 years research experience at my institution, and 4 years as a medical scribe before that.

I’m starting to apply for my next role. My resume is 3 pages — that includes education, a section of my certifications and proficiences, a professional experience section, and a section listing my publications in peer-reviewed clinical journals.

I’ve had a few friends that hire in IT and consulting look at my resume. But their feedback was to shorten it from 3 pages to 1 or 2 by “using a maximum of 4 brief, quantifiable accomplishment bullet points” for each position, instead of listing responsibilities. I feel like that advice doesn’t really work for CRC and similar jobs, and would fail to communicate my capabilities.

I want my resume to stand out from other applicants, by showing hiring managers the full scope of my duties, and that I’m very literate in all aspects of study conduct. I also want to make sure I’m including key phrases from job postings.

I could make it a little shorter by removing the “flowery” language, i.e. duties being followed with “to ensure data integrity,” “in accordance with FDA and NIH requirements”, etc. But then it really is just a bland list of duties, which is generally discouraged. And it would still be 3 pages.

(Ironic) TLDR — my questions:

1. I

s 3 pages reasonable?

2. If you think that length is fine, would you say it’s also fine for non-CRC job apps (start-up, ops, CRA), or would you recommend having adapted versions that cut out the in-depth CRC-related tasks and focus solely on duties related to those roles?

4. Do I

r

1. eally need to spell out every acronym (IRB, EDC, EMR, CTMS, DSMC, CRO, SIV, AEs, SUSARs, NTFs, CAPA, etc.), when anyone hiring a CRC should know what these mean? I’ll probably do so when applying through Glassdoor in case it might actually have to pass a recruiter or automated sniff test, but for internal submissions at my institution and other postings where I can safely assume a human involved in research will be reviewing it, can I save that space?