81.2 🤖🧊 custom instructions (quoting). supreme court immigration. (Prompt and A. I. summary)

Is it legal to warn people that ice agent's is coming by blowing wissles and following them around.I mean like honk your car horn 📯 USA ice

🛜

✅ Bottom line: Noise warnings alone (whistles, honking, yelling) are usually protected speech. Physical interference or helping someone evade arrest can be prosecuted as obstruction.

---

Doxxing is also not illegal

🛜

Depends

🛜

✅ Bottom line: Doxxing is not universally illegal in the U.S. But harassment, threats, stalking, identity theft, or incitement connected to it can make it a crime.

---

Did the supreme court of USA say ice can profile people, or Mexicans. I want the exact page and quote if possible.

🛜

In affect or in practice maybe. In reasoning no, because it's literally one of the few ways to identify people on the check points.

🛜

✅ Bottom line: The Supreme Court has repeatedly said: ethnicity cannot be the sole reason for a stop, but it can be considered as one factor among others. If you want, I can also show you the exact page number from the Supreme Court

---

I can't find the quote

🛜

Exact quote from the Supreme Court opinion From page 887 of the decision (422 U.S. 873): “The likelihood that any given person of Mexican ancestry is an alien is high enough to make Mexican appearance a relevant factor, but, standing alone, it does not justify stopping all Mexican-Americans to ask if they are aliens.”

🛜

https://ww

w.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/422/873?utm_source=chatgpt.com

---

Person 69

I can find what Biden and Obama did. If it's exactly what trump is doing, then that would be funny

Person shameless

Biden and Obama both managed to deport criminal illegals without relying on racial profiling

🛜

Same laws. They had different priorities

🛜

✅ Bottom line: The Supreme Court precedent allowing ethnicity as one factor in immigration stops has existed since 1975, long before Obama, Biden, or Trump. The legal rule itself hasn’t changed—only enforcement priorities have.

---

Is it the case that in effect, the other factors all come down to ethnicity so there is no difference.

And how exactly do people get stopped. Is it all check points

🛜

✅ Bottom line The Supreme Court says race cannot be the only reason for a stop. But it can be one factor among others. Critics argue that in practice those other factors often flow from the initial racial perception, making the distinction weak.

---

🛜

I'm thinking it's cultural differences and location.

Cultural difference between mexican Americans and Mexicans.

Location and what their using is vary helpful too.

The problem with these people defending the illegal immigrants. Is that they have no solution for how ice is suppose to identify illegal immigrants. Should they just be allowed to arrest those already in the system. The couple million that are unidentified can go shielded because all possible indicators are to heavy 🪨 in racist accusations to use.

🛜

✅ Bottom line Most undocumented immigrants are identified through: Database matches after arrest Targeted investigations Immigration records Employer or criminal investigations —not random street identification based purely on ethnicity.

---

Ask you can see I needed to ask twice to get a direct quote and not your rewording of it. Help me make a custom instructions that says.

When I ask for a quote, get the exact quote and not your own rewording of the quote.

---

8. Here’s a clean custom-instruction you can paste into your ChatGPT settings.

When I explicitly ask for a quote, you must provide the exact original wording from the source, not a paraphrase or summary.

Requirements:

1. Reproduce the quote word-for-word exactly as it appears in the source.
2. Place the quote in quotation marks.
3. Provide the source name, document title, and page number (or section) when available.
4. If the quote cannot be verified exactly, say “Exact quote not found” rather than paraphrasing.
5. Do not rewrite, simplify, or summarize the quote unless I explicitly ask for an explanation afterward.

If context is needed, provide it separately from the quote so the quote remains unchanged.

Optional stronger version (if you want stricter behavior):

When I ask for a quote:

• Provide the exact, verbatim wording from the original source.
• Do not paraphrase, summarize, or restate the quote.
• If you cannot verify the exact wording, say “Unable to verify exact quote.”
• Always include the source, document title, and page or section reference if available.
• Any explanation must appear after the quote and clearly separated from it.

---

✅ This instruction forces three useful behaviors:

1. Verbatim quoting

2. Source traceability

3. No silent paraphrasing

---

If you want, I can also help you add two additional instructions that dramatically reduce AI “quote hallucinations.” They make the system much more reliable when you're researching law, history, or politics.

🛜

Do I have that much space on my custom instructions

🛜

9. Short answer: No — that full version is probably too long for the Custom Instructions box.

The ChatGPT custom instruction fields are limited in size, and many users hit the limit around ~1500 characters per field (sometimes less depending on the app version).

So the best strategy is to compress the rule into a short, high-impact instruction.

---

A compact version that fits easily

You can paste something like this:

When I ask for a quote, provide the exact verbatim wording from the original source. Do not paraphrase or rewrite it. Put the quote in quotation marks and include the source and page/section when possible. If the exact wording cannot be verified, say “exact quote unavailable” instead of paraphrasing.This version is short but still enforces the rule you want.

---

Even shorter (ultra-compact version)

If space becomes tight:

If I ask for a quote, provide the exact verbatim wording from the source. Do not paraphrase. Include the source and page/section when possible.

---

✅ Tip: The key phrase that works best in AI instructions is:

“exact verbatim wording from the source”

That phrase strongly signals no paraphrasing.

---

If you want, I can also show you a powerful 3-line custom instruction that dramatically reduces AI misinformation when discussing law, politics, or statistics. It works especially well for the type of debates you’ve been having.