


take this one for example


> he has clearly told that he was being offered splitsvilla for 3 years and only came when he broke up. 


> "used Y in the show" - he didn't. they were an alliance. so Y allowed him to play with niharika as he was safe. moreover, Y posted on insta calling him bhai forever. Y isn't a child that anyone will use him


> Ak comes to his house, lives there, creates reels with him - and he's using her? outside of her equation with Y, sorab is clearly more popular (rajma chawal reels, songs attributed, people finding him hot). if anything he has always praised Ak. this is factually wrong.


> he doesn't like anuska. he didn't bully her anywhere. moreover, it was anuka who first said bad things about him. she's ott (again factually incorrect)


> "he's using niharika" niharika wanted to play with him too. they look happy with each other and are playing well. niharika is smart enough to figure out if someone is using her.


> he didn't bully keona lol. keona leeched on him he didn't even know her. are we watching the same show???


> "he's a loser" son of a mechanical who's a highly successful international m/odel, has done two tv shows, been offered multiple reality shows is a loser lol (he may be the most accomplished in the industry- correct me if i am wrong)


> "what has he done on the show" - made alliances, formed a connection (little late but t due to his age), played all the tasks well (won 2 out last 3 tasks). barking isn't "doing something". some of us prefer contestants that don't fight for the sake of it


some people here just lie and post factually incorrect jargon