I built an AI-Judged "Ranked Arena" for Debating. Need your logic/fallacy feedback.

Hey everyone,

Most people practice communication by watching videos or reading tips , but there is a massive mismatch between that and the reality of a high-pressure interview or debate.

I’m working on Debate Flow, a real-time arena where users are instantly matched with peers for structured, timed debates.

What makes this different:

• Real-Time AI Judge: Our engine converts speech to text and analyzes logic, fluency, and persuasion signals in seconds.
• Skill Radar: You get a multi-metric breakdown of your argument strength.
• Competitive Ranking: You earn an Elo-style rank to track your improvement over time.

We believe AI is finally fast enough for low-latency analysis, but we want to know if the logic holds up for actual debaters.

I need your feedback on:

1. Does an "AI Judge" sound useful or frustrating for your practice?
2. What specific metrics (logical fallacies, rebuttal strength, etc.) would you want to see on a Skill Radar?