People went on to hate on him and calling him diva now, so imma explain what exactly happened

Lewis was leading, then lost the lead, because his left front was dead. Leclerc saved his tyres better and got ahead of him. The gap to russell was about 2.1-2.3 at that time. And leclerc in just one lap while being ahead of lewis was reducing that gap. It was around 1.8 by the time the reached start finish straight before this moment. 

Then suddenly Leclerc just had drop of speed, probably because his battery was empty, and the gap went up to 2.4 to george, and lewis attacked him. 

Charles complained about it on the radio, because he thought they were gonna work in cooperation to not let george escape. And drivers also have to manage the energy, so the battle in s1 cost Ferrari drivers about a second. Doesn't matter what you guys think about Leclerc's strategy, leclerc wanted to try to close the gap to george

It's ok to fight when you both have nothing to gain at the front, but Charles did try to close the gap to george. In austin 2025 during sprint Leclerc didn't complain about Lewis passing him, for example. Because they couldn't gain any more, and it was just hard racing.

And i also saw comments like "he only cared about finishing in front of lewis; he didn't attack george". It's such a bullshit

Because:

1. If you didn't notice, but i did, Leclerc had a snap at the restart, which he admitted later in the interview, and that dropped him out of overtake mode's zone(1 sec). He spent 2 laps to close that gap and was finally in that zone, but it was already the end of the race. 

2. According to telemetry, Leclerc's softs were 7 laps older than George's. That's all you need to know about why Leclerc "didn't attack" George.

Misunderstanding of this situation is just crazy