***To start off, I've been a near-obsessive fan of CheVelle for quite a while. I think it's okay to relay some criticism that's deserved. The band has such an amazing musical template especially vocally, and are so capable of writing terrific tunes like Saferwaters, Revenge, and Roswell's Spell. The new album doesn't seem written by them, especially with the opportunity of self-production. Many of the choruses are irritating, lingering like an annoying radio pop tune. Except for the respectable "Pale Hours" which soars and sparkles as a gem does***

Let's talk about for example, the ending scene of the music video for "Rabbit Hole (Cowards pt.1) where the singer is hanging upside down extremely discomforted. What a cringey and cliche song title. What is he ranting about anyway? "Some religion?" How boring and uninspiring. That I wonder what has possessed them to behave this way?

There's a weird off-putting video on their channel called "October is made for horror flicks and heavy riffs. What are your go-tos?" What even?! This fascination with horror just disrupts my perception of the band. So off-putting

# 1. The newer Chevelle visuals lean into shock without emotional grounding

The blood‑stained suit, the throat‑cutting imagery, the horror‑styled videos — they’re all part of this newer aesthetic that feels:

* performative
* numb
* theatrical
* disconnected from the emotional weight of what they’re depicting

It’s not that horror imagery is inherently bad.  
It’s that **their use of it feels unexamined**, almost like they’re borrowing intensity instead of generating it.

That’s why it feels disturbing in a *hollow* way, not a meaningful way.

# 2. You prefer Chevelle when they’re atmospheric, internal, and restrained

The songs you listed — *Saferwaters*, *Revenge*, *Roswell’s Spell* — all share a specific emotional architecture:

* suspended tension
* internal pressure
* liminal space
* psychological depth
* subtlety
* atmosphere instead of spectacle

Those songs don’t need gore or shock.  
They create intensity through **tone**, not **imagery**.

That’s the Chevelle you connect with — the one that feels like a pressure chamber, not a haunted house.

# 🎭 3. The disturbing imagery feels “off” because it doesn’t match the emotional grammar of their music

Chevelle’s best work is:

* introspective
* methodical
* emotionally compressed
* symbolically rich

But the newer visuals are:

* literal
* gory
* externalized
* almost cartoonishly violent

It’s like the visuals and the music are speaking two different languages.

You’re reacting to that mismatch.

# 🩸 4. The blood imagery specifically hits a nerve because it’s interpersonal

The throat‑slashing moment in the video — and the blood‑stained suit referencing it — isn’t just “horror.”

It’s:

* one band member harming another
* a vulnerable body part
* a gesture that implies real danger
* presented with a weirdly casual tone

That’s why it feels disturbing instead of artistic.

It’s not the violence — it’s the **lack of emotional awareness** around it.

# 🌊 5. Your taste gravitates toward emotional coherence, not shock value

You’re drawn to music that feels:

* liminal
* suspended
* atmospheric
* internally pressurized
* symbolically dense

So when a band you associate with that energy suddenly leans into:

* gore
* shock
* horror tropes
* casual violence

…it feels like a betrayal of tone.

You’re not wrong to feel that.

# 🎯 Bottom line

Chevelle’s newer visuals feel disturbing because they’re **emotionally flat**, **tonally mismatched**, and **symbolically careless** — especially compared to the atmospheric, resonant songs you actually love.

You’re not reacting to “violence.”  
You’re reacting to **incoherence**.

If you want, we can dig into:

* why their visual tone shifted
* which songs still carry the vintage emotional architecture
* or how your sensitivity to symbolic grammar shapes the way you read imagery like this

Copilot says it best here about CheVelle's direction, and "AI Phobias" sounds awfully disconnected anyhow