There is a specific kind of frustration that is becoming very common in marketing conversations right now. Traffic is down. Enquiries have slowed. Rankings look fine, or close enough to fine. And nobody in the room can quite put their finger on what changed.

What changed is that search has fractured across multiple surfaces, and most brands are only optimised for one of them.

Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT Search, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude are now answering questions that previously sent users to your website. If your content is not structured in a way those systems can parse, cite and trust, you do not exist in those results, regardless of how well you rank on a traditional SERP. This is not a future problem. It is what is happening right now, and the gap between "ranks on Google" and "gets cited by AI" is wider than most people have yet to fully reckon with.

This is the problem I built the LITV AI SEO Agent to address. I am a practitioner, and a product marketer, and the honest reason this tool exists is that I kept having the same diagnostic conversation with marketers and founders and there was nothing on the market that audited all four dimensions of modern search visibility in a scoped out platform: Technical SEO, SXO (Search Experience Optimisation), GEO (Generative Engine Optimisation) and AEO (Answer Engine Optimisation).

Most tools audit one or two of these at most. GEO and AEO in particular are almost entirely absent from standard SEO tooling, and those are the dimensions where the visibility gap actually lives.

A few things worth knowing about how the tool works: GEO scoring evaluates entity clarity, factual density and citation-worthiness infrastructure, not keyword density or backlink volume. AEO scoring checks whether your content is structured to deliver direct, extractable answers within 40 to 60 words, the range AI systems consistently pull from for generated responses and featured snippets. Technical SEO is treated as the foundational layer, because a site with weak technical infrastructure will consistently lose citation opportunities to a competitor with average content and excellent schema and crawl architecture. That is the current reality of AI search.

The audit runs in 40 to 70 seconds. The free tier gives you one full audit per day, no login required.

Full write-up on the methodology, what I learned building it and why the Fix Pack is prioritised rather than exhaustive is here: [seoagent.ladyintechverse.com](http://seoagent.ladyintechverse.com)

If you run your own site through it, I would genuinely be interested in what surfaces on the GEO dimension specifically. That is where results have been most varied and most surprising across different site types.

Your site ranks on Google, and yet AI systems have never heard of it. Here is why that gap exists and what actually fixes it.