Rustler 10 vs. Dynastar M Free 100

Hoping some of you guys have skied these 2 skis and can provide some insight. I am 5'11 190 lbs, advanced (not expert) skier that primarily skis Whistler. I am looking for an off-piste biased daily driver all mountain ski around 100mm waist width. I ski pretty aggressively and weigh enough that I need a relatively stiff ski. I already have a pair of Volkl Mantra M7's and Rustler 11's as my powder ski. I really like the Mantra's and ski them in a lot of conditions, but they aren't ideal in tight trees and mogul type terrain, so that's the gap I am looking to fill. I've heard a lot of good things about the Dynastar M Free 100 and that's what I was assuming I would end up buying. However, I recently demoed Rustler 10's and really liked them and considering grabbing a pair. On one hand, it would feel kind of weird to own both the Rustler 10's and 11's, but they felt different enough that I would feel comfortable owning both. I also demoed the Rossignol Sender 100, which was a solid ski, and quite similar to the Rustler 10's overall, but just lacked the character that I liked from the Rustler 10's.

The plan would be that the Mantra's are my daily driver when the conditions are more hard pack or icy, or if I know I will be skiing groomers more than off-piste, the Rustler 11 would be for any day with a decent amount of fresh snow, and the Rustler 10 (or M Free 100) would be for everything in between.

Unfortunately, I don't have the opportunity to demo the M Free's, although I could probably find a shop to rent them from if I really wanted to. The Rustler 10's definitely felt good enough that I would buy them regardless - but just curious to hear from anyone who has skied both to know if I should try to rent the M Free's before deciding to buy a pair of Rustler 10's.