The sheer hypocrisy leaking from the facets of polsci students

The academe more precisely establishes the principle of democracy, and who else understands the importance of unity and organized structured than PolSci students. Yes’ in your holy crusade to tarnish the reputation of “him” because he exists foreign outside your system, possessing opposing belief that opts himself more than your community, and thus becoming shamed here even because of it. Resentment in this case is reasonable and understandable, however how is it when the quota is “formally” dissolved, many would act in the same way that was previously condemned? The preaching of the quota and the devotion to it just disappears, and in its place is the same vice of character that you just recently publicly humiliated. Was the adherence to the quota just because of an agreed convention, or to help the classmates by restricting the curve? Even if we no longer practice the quota, the essence of it must still exist, like an unwritten rule, yet now, it’s as if it’s been forgotten. Im curious as to why this is, is it because of something petty that if he does it, i should do it; is it an act of resignation, of indifference, to yield and surrender where we might as well do it because of the nonexistence of the possibility for change? Still, it’s contradictory; if you wish to help your classmates (even if they don’t raise their hands), a limit should still be psychologically imposed, there is no more need to raise the bar especially when you’re chances to pass the subject is already clear within the horizon. The dominant party of the class with overreaching influence to other cliques may interpret this as an attack, but i am only typing an observation. God bless.