Could demand management take different forms, or does it not work like that?

Logically there are plenty of ways to manage supply and demand...a few ways I could see Anthropic doing that for us are:

1. Queuing - your CC takes little naps in coordination with others, so you still get max effort, it just takes longer to get answers when the system is near capacity. that's fine, I need to get lunch anyway.

2. Surge pricing - if you have tokens and need max effort right away, pay a token premium to jump to the front of the queue, premium depends on the surge demand just like Uber used to do it.

3. Lower quality - accept lower effort at full speed, if you're doing simple tasks and don't need max effort right now, save complex tasks for off-peak time

Giving us a choice of one or more has 2 benefits to Anthropic:

- Gives them data on what types of workflow users choose which option and when for future automated optimization

- Builds buy-in through choice...rather than silently throttling effort (which can do real harm...bugs introduced due to silent sudden effort throttling has real consequences), users make a choice and accept the costs of that choice willingly.

Are these technically feasible, or is the architecture of how Claude actually works a constraint that prevents these kinds of options?