Trump’s Genocidal Rhetoric

Discussion

I feel like I’m going crazy here. Trump’s instantly infamous Truth Social post where he threatens to annihilate an entire civilization.

Yet in the minds of FoxBrains, it is perfectly acceptable.

Now it was followed the next day by a Ceasefire. But it still stands, he threatened a country of 90 million people with death and destruction.

Morally, what even is that? Under normal circumstances, would this not be considered unacceptable and evil? Isn’t stating something like that horrible in of itself even if you don’t follow through? We all know Trump wouldn’t hesitate to follow through, but what even is that? It’s like he just unintentionally invented a new morally grey area.

Posted Apr 10, 2026, 12:42 AM UTC

2413
Loading comments…