Introduction

This is the fifth entry in my series of original LoRAs created for Tsubaki.2.

In the previous chapter, I explored how combining two of my LoRAs

can function as a detail‑enhancement technique — showing how their

micro‑features stack and reinforce each other without overriding the base model.



This time, we’re going one step further:

What happens when you load all three LoRAs at the same time?

Eins, Izanami, and Belphegor — three completely different directions, three different origins, and three different internal logics.

Let’s see what happens when they collide.



Q&A

Q. How did you end up creating three LoRAs with completely different directions?

A.

Saying “They happened by accident!” would be a terrible answer, so here’s the real one:

* Eins was shaped through prompt‑based style control.
* Izanami emerged because DMD2 is absurdly strong and pairs exceptionally well with Haruka v2.
* Belphegor developed her own direction thanks to training on images featuring her distinctive fur‑trim around the neck and shoulders.

Each LoRA came from a different approach, and the differences naturally accumulated.

The result: three LoRAs that refuse to overlap in the same way.



Q. Tsubaki.2 defaults to Standard Mode, so why do you generate in Light Mode?

A.

Because Light Mode is fast, inexpensive, and perfect for running large batches of tests.

For anyone doing research or comparative analysis, being able to increase the number of trials is incredibly valuable.

Light Mode lets me iterate quickly and observe patterns that would otherwise be too costly to catch.



Q. I’ve heard SDXL‑based models contain lots of mysterious hidden characters.

If I find one, is it okay to make a LoRA out of them?

A.

Absolutely — please do.

There’s no way I can discover every mysterious character on my own,

and even if I find them, I can’t always turn them into LoRAs.

There are many charming, half‑formed, or fully‑formed characters buried inside these models.

If you find one, feel free to excavate them, refine them, and give them a proper identity.



The more people who explore these hidden characters,

the more interesting this little world becomes.



After the short Q&A about how the 3‑LoRA setup came to be,

let’s move on to the actual performance of the

Eins / Izanami / Belphegor 3‑LoRA combination.

  
Seed Value

The fixed seed below applies only to the Light‑chan comparison:



3078755227476121



(The Classic Anime and Chibi Style tests were generated without a fixed seed.)





Image Order & What to Look For

(3‑LoRA: 0.7 → 0.4 → 0.2 → 0)



For this comparison, the images are arranged in the following order:

* 3‑LoRA strength 0.7
* 3‑LoRA strength 0.4
* 3‑LoRA strength 0.2
* 3‑LoRA strength 0.0（identical to Light Mode）



How to Read the Comparison

Light → 0.7 → 0.4 → 0.2 → 0

shows how the combined LoRA behaves as a detail enhancer rather than a character reproducer.

Why 0.7 and 0.4 look almost identical

When all three LoRAs are loaded simultaneously,

their effects saturate very quickly — meaning 0.4 is effectively the upper limit

for stable detail enhancement.

At 0.7, the output does not collapse,

but the improvement over 0.4 is minimal.

This is a key difference from the 2‑LoRA experiments in the previous chapter,

where 0.4 still had room to grow.

Important note:

At equal strength (0.4), 3‑LoRA produces stronger detail than any 2‑LoRA pair,

but this comes from saturation, not synergy.



Light‑chan × 3‑LoRA — Detail Behavior

The 3‑LoRA combination produces:

* Eins: structural stability
* Izanami: micro‑contrast & gloss
* Belphegor: shadow density & texture weight

Together, they create a dense, high‑clarity detail layer on top of Light Mode.

0.7

* Maximum enhancement
* Deep shadows, strong texture, high contrast
* Slight risk of oversharpening

0.4

* Nearly identical to 0.7
* Stable, balanced, and the most practical setting
* This is the effective “ceiling” for 3‑LoRA use

0.2

* Gentle enhancement
* Light Mode softness preserved
* Subtle polish without stylistic shift



Classic Anime Style × 3‑LoRA

Classic Anime Style has a strong, fixed aesthetic.

When combined with the 3‑LoRA stack, the behavior changes dramatically.

0.4

* The LoRA completely overrides the style
* Flat shading becomes dense texture
* Strong shadows and gloss dominate the output

0.2

* Still heavily influenced by the LoRA
* Some simplicity remains
* But the LoRA’s detail weight is unmistakable

0

* Pure Classic Anime Style
* Flat colors, minimal texture, soft contrast

Conclusion:

3‑LoRA behaves as a style‑overwriting detail layer when paired with Classic Anime.



Chibi Style × 3‑LoRA

Chibi Style behaves very differently from Classic Anime.

0.4

* Chibi proportions remain intact
* LoRA adds texture and depth without breaking the style
* Strongest “coexistence” effect

0.2

* Gentle enhancement
* Chibi softness preserved
* Slight boost to color depth and shadow weight

0

* Pure Chibi Style
* Flat, soft, minimal detail

Conclusion:

Unlike Classic Anime, Chibi Style coexists with the 3‑LoRA stack

instead of being overwritten.



Conclusion

These tests show that:

* 3‑LoRA has a practical upper limit at strength 0.4
* At equal strength (0.4), 3‑LoRA produces stronger detail than any 2‑LoRA pair
* This is due to saturation, not synergy
* Classic Anime Style is overwritten by the LoRA stack
* Chibi Style coexists with the LoRA stack
* Light‑chan gains the most stable and balanced enhancement

This concludes the 3‑LoRA combined experiment.

In the next post, I’ll move on to the final summary chapter,

where I’ll consolidate the findings from all experiments

and discuss practical usage guidelines.

Part 5 – Testing Detail LoRA Behavior in Tsubaki.2: Triple‑LoRA Combination of Eins / Izanami / Belphegor