Men are not radicalised enough and it's costing them.

Most of the conflicts generally end in a settlement. Because cost of a war has to be taken into consideration. So there are range of possible settlements that are mutually beneficial to both sides.

Problem is that these expected settlements tilt towards the side who is more radicalised because they are willing toinflict more damage to the other side. So if men are not radicalised and women are, then men will be on a losing end.

So for example Rad Fems have been talking about taking due process rights from men, taking away the right of accused to face the accuser in court of law, cross examination (because its traumatizing or whatever). Not to mention the duluth model that presumed men to be primary aggressors or radfems fighting against equal custody rights. Radfems were actually able to take away any rights of the accused in college campuses title 9 hearings and are still trying to do so (after it was reversed)

If men are not radical, then they will just be fighting for equal rights while Redfems will inflict heavy cost on men because they technically dont have anything to lose. At worst they will get equal rights and best they will take away rights of men. And men will only be the one to pay to cost for fighting for their rights.

Men need to be the one to get radicalised and start inflicting cost on women. Abortion rights were taken away from some women it actually led the democratic party to pretend to care about mens issues this election.

Men need to fight to restrict access to birth control, no-fault divorce, and anything that hurt the interests of women. Men don't need to believe them, hell I don't even believe in these issues but working against wome is necessary. When the cost of this gender war becomes too much, then women will make a deal with men where both get equality. Until then we are fighting a losing battle.