In the world of compact cars and even some mid-size hybrids, the 3-cyl engine has become the industry standard.

So Suzuki has done the same with the new Swift despite with the NA engine. 

I prefer Swift with the MT over the AMT.

Jumping right into the positives:

The 5 speed manual is slick with short throws and a very light clutch.

Despite a cylinder less the engine offers excellent low end torque, low speeds in higher gears is a breeze in stop and go traffic.

When revved the 3cyl engine sounds very good which is very pleasant to ears

 Fuel efficiency and Swift go hand in hand, with the new 3cyl there's a slight improvement in the mileage figures 

Handling and composure is good and the steering is precise with the strong return to centre action which is a boon for Swift lovers considering how bad it was in the previous gen cars

Here comes the negatives:

Lower performance with the bhp down from 89 to 81, it lacks the top end performance of the 4cyl one

Obviously there will be refinement issues when compared with the previous 4cyl one, not that bad but that sound can be felt during the initial startup.

Typical maruti grade plastics all over 

At lower speeds the suspension felt a little bit on the firmer side 

Improvement with the under thigh support would be nice and adding a center armrest for driver and in the rear would be appreciable 

A better profile tyres would be nice, those look skinny and most of them will definitely upgrade for a slightly larger profile one

The 3cyl is better for daily commute and high mileage figures but it lacks the smoother redline revving of the engine.

Is 3-cyl the new norm?