DOJ says North Carolina man pleaded guilty to doxxing Supreme Court justice - how should platforms handle doxxing cases?

A North Carolina man has pleaded guilty to federal charges tied to doxxing and threatening a U.S. Supreme Court justice after allegedly posting private addresses online and encouraging violence.

The case highlights how accessible personal information has become online - and how quickly it can be weaponized.

At the same time, debates continue around:

• Platform moderation responsibilities
• Public records accessibility
• Data broker exposure
• Free speech vs targeted harassment
• Whether stronger anti-doxxing laws are needed

Do you think social platforms are doing enough to stop doxxing and coordinated harassment?
What technical or legal solutions would actually work without creating overreach?

Interested to hear perspectives from privacy researchers, lawyers, sysadmins, and threat intel folks here.

Source: https://therecord.media/north-carolina-man-pleads-guilty-to-doxxing