Ever notice that whenever women define a real man they only list things that benefit them. That make their lives easier. Things we can only do if we have a woman in our lives. Now I will say this as a married man, yes being with a woman really puts your manhood to test. It does and can bring the opportunities to put your manhood and its skills and traits on the frontline to use.  However, why when a single woman is asked what a real man is she never speaks on a man who has a relationship with God, one who controls his dick, one who isn’t impulsive with money or temptations, one who isn’t a pushover but is strategic and patient with the Art of war , one with a routine and is disciplined, one who can’t lose sight of his purpose on Earth for no one…? They always list things that revolve around them and their presence being necessary for those things to even happen. So by their logic you’re not a man without a woman. Now ask them to define a real woman….men always remember God made Eve for Adam not Adam for Eve. I’m not saying Adam wasn’t to watch after Eve. What I’m saying is Adam was made for God and the Garden (purpose) then along the way of tending to Eden (purpose) God saw Adam needed help. So he made Eve from Adam’s DNA; and He made her for Him…… uninstall the programming that tells you you were made for women. To live and die for them

Why Is Women’s Definition of a Real Man always Based around Them