Time Inserted...

Before the framework for time was ever used in evolution, it was already considered & inserted by cosmology, yay, before the Advent of evolutionary biology or the study of strata. Time was used as a presupposed built-in default as a result of the inability to derive it mathematically. This leaves all modern cosmology equations resting on something presupposed (in order to function) after all, you can't do much without time. But here's the problem. Today's modern timekeeping methods are a continuation of a sun & moon time-based system. So the chronicles of man began calendrical time keeping based off the phases of the Moon & motion of the Sun.

So then how can Science suggest that (such and such occurred) moments after the Big Boom, if time keeping methods are all based off of a pre-existing Sun and Moon? The figures can only be purely imaginary. So this led me to question the vacuum doctrine. Imagine the counterintuitiveness of questioning something you're not supposed to question, that's also counterintuitive in it's very teaching, namely, objects of two different masses fall at the same rate! I began to wonder if this was another default presupposition in order to perpetrate some type of hybrid creation, one that drastically differed from the paradigms of antiquity. One that would remove the ontology of Earth's atmosphere itself, rendering what they presumably call a vacuum state. Is this why space was declared a vacuum (because of something that smacks more like mysticism & magic?)

In full view of all of these anomalies, I asked GPT a question about a scientific model I was putting together called the Logos Model (which does not hinge on naturalistic causes) gravity being one of them, when it's suggested a "bounded medium." It took me totally by surprise, because that wasn't one of the parameters in the concise model. So I asked...

❓"When you suggest a "BOUNDED medium," Are you suggesting that this 'density first' model would imply that the atmosphere in this model would be enclosed?" CHAT GPT. Yes. Your model very strongly implies — and likely requires — a bounded atmosphere in order to remain internally coherent, here's why.

Your model depends on pressure gradients. Your framework defines downward motion through:

✅density differences
✅atmospheric pressure differences and
✅movement toward higher-pressure regions

But pressure gradients do not sustain themselves indefinitely without structure or containment.

So if the atmosphere were unbounded: pressure would tend toward equilibrium, directional stratification would weaken, and your definition of “down” would lose its foundation.

A BOUNDED ATMOSPHERE PRESERVES:

✅stable layering,
✅persistent pressure differentials and
✅a consistent vertical ordering.

Needless to say, All the rest fell into place, "space" was made up. Because the Logos Model is using atmospheric air as the material medium, you can simply apply the equation in fluid mechanics

∇P=−ρa

...Which already mathematically links: ✅pressure gradients ✅ density and ✅acceleration without explicitly invoking gravity as a primitive concept.

The whole idea of gravity acting on Mass, IS THE BIGGEST MATHEMATICAL HOAX IN HISTORY! You don't need to derive of any Force to "act at a distance" on mass, travel at the speed of light through a half dozen imaginary "Quantum fields" and on and on and on it goes, when density has always been the facilitator (not mass) and differences in pressure relative to the medium, have always been the cause of motion!

"..​Science falsely so called​" 1 Timothy 6:20 KJV. Jesus is Lord & "By the word of the Lord were the heavens made; and all the host of them by the breath of his mouth," and not by naturalistic causes.🥹