Gregory of Nyssa and Universalism

This may be outside the normal questions this sub typically gets, so forgive me if this sounds like theology-promoting, I’m not promoting any theology here.

Universalism was one of the three views of hell that some early Christians held (the other two of course being eternal torment and annihilationism). Augustine is typically credited with setting eternal hell as the very dominant Christian view, since before him the other two views can be found fairly commonly. One of the most notable examples of universalism would be Origen of Alexandria from the 3rd century, who was condemned (anathematized) at The Second Council of Constantinople in 553. The council also includes “if anyone believes that the punishment of wicked men and demons is only temporary, and that one day a restoration (apokatastasis) will take place, let him be anathema” (paraphrasing). Some scholars have debated whether or not the condemnation of belief in universalism is original to the actual Council, or if it was slightly later added in, but what is agreed on is Origen was condemned (although again here, that’s debated whether or not his universalism had much to do with it or if it was more so with the preexisting souls idea). Regardless of the mechanics, some early Christians opposed universalism enough to anathematize it, whether authoritatively or not.

All that said, Gregory of Nyssa was another early universalist, but he doesn’t appear to have been controversial in any sense as he was a strong defender of Trinitarianism, and today is venerated as a saint by the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches (also in Oriental Orth., Lutheranism, and Anglicanism). Combining these two, we appear to have a view which more Christians eventually became hostile towards, while simultaneously having a highly respected man never fall out of favor after his death.

So, is there any method by which we can measure the question as to why Gregory of Nyssa still remained highly respected after his death while universalism as a whole received very negative pushback towards The Church eventually? This seems either very inconsistent among early anti-universalists, or I’m just missing key historical points that would’ve already helped me find an answer.