Hi!

Hi everyone,

I'm Nikita. I'm 25. I just joined and am anxious to introduce myself. I hope I am not taking up needless space in this feed. I thank anyone for taking the time to read my post.

Being new to r/Gynarchism, I am relieved to see that there are so many others who share my worldview. For the past two months or so, I have fully internalized an overwhelmingly deep love and respect for prototypical Women and Femininity more broadly. I use the word prototypical because I feel that I cannot extend the same level of appreciation to all living Women today, some of whom are not physically attractive, intelligent, or Feminine. I am therefore a Gynarchist in a neo-Platonist sense.

Allow me to clarify my position: Women are the physical embodiment of Femininity, just as men are the physical embodiment of Masculinity. It follows that men, in their perfect form, evolved to be tall and strong (thus allowing them to be better able to serve and defend Women) while Women, in their perfect form, evolved to command grace and authority (thus allowing them to be better equipped to lead). In other words, Masculinity and Femininity are contingent on the Female and male gaze, respectively. Take the two constructs to their extremes and you arrive at what I believe societies should be directed to approximate: A Gynarchy strictly composed of healthy, intelligent, and attractively Feminine Superwomen. To be clear, I do not aim to objectify Women in the toxic, or classical, sense. I treat Women for what they are: An object of worship.

I am aware that there may be competing visions out there, which is totally expected and exciting. After all, this forum is intended to be a space where ideas are regularly exchanged and socially negotiated. I hope there is still a place for me in this community, despite my somewhat more, exclusive, brand of Female supremacy.

On another note, it is simple to speculate that as humanity progresses, so too will our abilities to enhance and modify the traits already assigned to each gender, which are assumed to be taken as axiomatic. For discussion, I pose the following series of questions: Will men and Women be the same as they are today? If yes, will the change threaten the integrity of the Female supremacist movement? Should societies focus on enhancing Female biology, at the expense of enhancing male biology?

At around the time I was twelve, I had briefly experienced sexual dysphoria. I envied Women and Girls so much, I wanted to be one. Needless to say, I learned that that wouldn't really work. As I matured, I came to embrace my male inferiority, seeing it as a valuable tool for Women. I've found that I deeply enjoy helping Women. It is an intensely rewarding experience. I've even mustered the courage to finally bulk up so that in the future I may be in a better position to protect them.

I am fascinated by Female supremacy and the concept of a Matriarchy/Gynarchy. I suppose I began as a philogynist. My identity would later extend to accommodate a political dimension; endowing me with a newfound sense of purpose. I avoid identifying as a Feminist, which is incredibly vague. Besides, I am opposed to the assumption that underpins liberal feminism, which mistakenly posits that men and women are equal across all situations. My passion for Women, combined with my prior interest in political philosophy, motivated me to compose an essay. I hope to post excerpts in the future for some of you to discuss. I'd especially love to hear the perspectives of Female members.

Admittedly, I do get aroused by the thought of a world dominated by Women. I do not see it as a problem. On the contrary, I see it as, dare I say, a healthy sign of acclimation. I've noticed a number of members in the forum express contempt for anything remotely veering on fetishism. Human sexuality, however, should be understood as simply another area where Women should naturally lead. Hence, topics of sexuality and family dynamics involving children should merit some discussion. Something else I do not like to see is misandrist content. While I know that the forum is meant to reflect a democratic climate, I can't help but cringe and feel sad for the members who harbor a hate for men. Men, or good boys, rather, collectively form an invaluable component of a thriving Matriarchy, whom Women, namely heterosexual Women, can adore. It risks excluding an entire group of which I am a part of and betrays the good and compassionate spirit I am convinced is nestled within every Woman. It also risks perpetuating an anti-Feminist trope that is often recycled by the patriarchy. Furthermore, if your intention is to make Female supremacy more widely appealing, definitely don't exclude and antagonize the other entire half of the global human population.

From a young age, I've always admired Women. I've observed my Mother do everything; from managing the household, me, and Her career at the same time. Women are also smarter. At school, such as while being immersed in a group project, I've felt that Girls possessed a faster speed of intuition, leaving me often in a state of awe. These observations made me realize that Women can handle nearly anything and outperform men in every field; a trend unfolding before our very eyes. I haven't introduced my Mother to my worldview, though I have repeatedly issued Her subtle hints. She laughs encouragingly and we've come to enjoy a better relationship.

Women are more resilient; can better tolerate pain; live longer; create life; are smarter; are better leaders; are better drivers; require less energy to burn; can more effectively multitask; and have a natural predisposition to be clean, agreeable, and socially conscious; among a whole slew of other obvious facts.

My goal is to empower Women through my ideas and be adored by Women in return. I hope to have contributed to the establishment of a new world order wherein Women are centered across every facet of life.

Bye for now,

N.