Oblivious to implications?

Before I say anything just know im not hating on any theories I just am genuinely curious!

So recently I went on twitter and it seems most my tl is saying that the jax trans theory was obviously confirmed. Yes yes, i know its twitter, but at the same time im genuinely confused on what is and isnt "confirmed"! Ive genuinely seen most people call jax by she/her now?? They also brought up that post by gooseworx where she mentioned how some people overlook implications that are fairly obvious. Honestly, that "deep and personal" secret jax told his mom could make sense, but that interpretation honestly never crossed my mind. So now I'm wondering if it was intended to be an obvious implication or if it was meant to stay ambiguous.

Was I oblivious when it came to that implication? I've seen some people bring up things that support the theory, but at the same time there's a few things that counteract it. Im also genuinely curious about yalls opinion and theories.

Lastly, ᵖˡᵉᵃˢᵉ ᵇᵉ ⁿᶦᶜᵉ ᵗᵒ ᵐᵉ ᶦᵐ ʲᵘˢᵗ ᵃ ᶜᵘʳᶦᵒᵘˢ ᵍᵃˡ